PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FTAD.L vs. USSC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTAD.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) and USSC.L (SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTAD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while USSC.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTAD.L returned 10.20%/yr vs 10.83%/yr for USSC.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTAD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for USSC.L.

Performance

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAD.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTAD.L is traded in GBP, while USSC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USSC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAD.L achieves a 5.88% return, which is significantly lower than USSC.L's 14.21% return.

FTAD.L

1D
0.14%
1M
1.96%
YTD
5.88%
6M
8.26%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
—

USSC.L

1D
0.73%
1M
2.58%
YTD
14.21%
6M
13.60%
1Y
38.05%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTAD.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF		5.88%23.18%8.98%8.00%0.33%17.32%-10.00%21.46%-7.86%
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF		14.21%6.56%10.22%17.02%0.54%36.50%5.57%18.50%-6.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAD.L and USSC.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018

0.62

The correlation between FTAD.L and USSC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FTAD.L
USSC.L

Financial Services

24.2%
19.8%

Industrials

14.5%
14.7%

Healthcare

12.8%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

12.1%
6.0%

Energy

10.9%
11.2%

Basic Materials

8.4%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
14.0%

Utilities

5.1%
2.5%

Communication Services

3.0%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
6.2%

Technology

1.7%
9.4%

Financial Services

FTAD.L
24.2%
USSC.L
19.8%

Industrials

FTAD.L
14.5%
USSC.L
14.7%

Healthcare

FTAD.L
12.8%
USSC.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTAD.L
12.1%
USSC.L
6.0%

Energy

FTAD.L
10.9%
USSC.L
11.2%

Basic Materials

FTAD.L
8.4%
USSC.L
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FTAD.L
5.6%
USSC.L
14.0%

Utilities

FTAD.L
5.1%
USSC.L
2.5%

Communication Services

FTAD.L
3.0%
USSC.L
2.7%

Real Estate

FTAD.L
1.7%
USSC.L
6.2%

Technology

FTAD.L
1.7%
USSC.L
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF

SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF

Often compared with FTAD.L:
FTAD.L vs. FGT.LFTAD.L vs. VMIG.LFTAD.L vs. VOOFTAD.L vs. VUKG.LFTAD.L vs. PRIZ.LFTAD.L vs. MIVO.LFTAD.L vs. MVED.L
Often compared with USSC.L:
USSC.L vs. R2SC.LUSSC.L vs. SPYUSSC.L vs. SLYVUSSC.L vs. IEUSUSSC.L vs. VBRUSSC.L vs. IMID.LUSSC.L vs. MOGB.L

Return for Risk

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FTAD.L
FTAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FTAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
USSC.L
USSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
USSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAD.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FTAD.LUSSC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.87
2.41

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.61
3.24

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

5.31

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

17.68

-10.01

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the USSC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAD.L and USSC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FTAD.LUSSC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.41

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.53

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.57

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.53

-0.03

Drawdowns

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, smaller than the maximum USSC.L drawdown of -43.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAD.L and USSC.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FTAD.LUSSC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.48%

-43.40%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-7.13%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-28.91%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.17%

-28.91%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-43.40%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

0.00%

-3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-7.95%

+3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.15%

+0.48%

Volatility

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAD.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) have volatilities of 3.86% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FTAD.LUSSC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.69%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

10.24%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

15.72%

-4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.74%

20.60%

-7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

22.18%

-6.62%

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than USSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTAD.L vs. USSC.L - Dividend Comparison

FTAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while USSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FTAD.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF		2.69%2.95%3.74%3.34%3.41%3.26%3.03%5.41%3.65%
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FTAD.L and USSC.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTAD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTAD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.

FTAD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while USSC.L is Small Cap Value Equities. FTAD.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FTAD.L and 0.30% for USSC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAD.L and USSC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer