PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTABX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTABX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTABX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 11.56% return.


FTABX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.82%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.99%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
2.38%

FNILX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.04%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.44%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTABX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTABX
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund
1.61%5.60%1.54%7.51%-10.74%2.20%4.80%8.58%1.76%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
11.56%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FTABX and FNILX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.04

The correlation between FTABX and FNILX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTABX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTABX
FTABX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTABX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTABXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.45

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.28

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

15.01

-6.49

FTABX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTABX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTABX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTABXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

2.48

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.82

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.76

+0.29

Drawdowns

FTABX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTABX drawdown since its inception was -16.14%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTABX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTABXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.14%

-33.76%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-9.01%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.99%

-19.08%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-25.40%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

0.00%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-5.37%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.97%

-1.07%

Volatility

FTABX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) is 1.09%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that FTABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTABXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

2.88%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

8.99%

-6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76%

11.93%

-9.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

17.25%

-13.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

20.04%

-15.75%

FTABX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTABX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTABX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FTABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTABX
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund
3.21%4.18%2.81%2.90%2.16%2.27%2.64%2.94%3.01%3.49%4.22%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTABX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNILX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to FTABX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTABX dropped -16.14% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FTABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTABX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer