PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSZ vs. RFEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSZ vs. RFEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSZ achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than RFEU's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FSZ has outperformed RFEU with an annualized return of 10.25%, while RFEU has yielded a comparatively lower 8.10% annualized return.


FSZ

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.06%
YTD
2.53%
6M
1.73%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.25%

RFEU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.83%
1Y
13.93%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
8.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSZ vs. RFEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.50%30.78%-1.78%16.19%-24.17%22.83%6.25%23.21%-17.57%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FSZ and RFEU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2016

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FSZ and RFEU has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSZ vs. RFEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSZ
RFEU

Financial Services

22.0%
18.9%

Industrials

17.1%
15.4%

Healthcare

14.6%
13.3%

Basic Materials

9.8%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
9.3%

Technology

4.9%
12.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.8%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Utilities

2.4%
6.4%

Energy

-

8.7%

Financial Services

FSZ
22.0%
RFEU
18.9%

Industrials

FSZ
17.1%
RFEU
15.4%

Healthcare

FSZ
14.6%
RFEU
13.3%

Basic Materials

FSZ
9.8%
RFEU
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FSZ
7.3%
RFEU
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

FSZ
4.9%
RFEU
9.3%

Technology

FSZ
4.9%
RFEU
12.5%

Communication Services

FSZ
2.4%
RFEU
3.8%

Real Estate

FSZ
2.4%
RFEU

-

Utilities

FSZ
2.4%
RFEU
6.4%

Energy

FSZ

-

RFEU
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSZ vs. RFEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

RFEU
RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSZ vs. RFEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSZRFEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

2.98

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

11.26

-8.65

FSZ vs. RFEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the RFEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSZ and RFEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSZ vs. RFEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSZ drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum RFEU drawdown of -39.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZ and RFEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSZRFEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-39.74%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-5.15%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

-13.48%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

-35.92%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-39.74%

+5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

-0.11%

-4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-9.57%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

1.35%

+2.89%

Volatility

FSZ vs. RFEU - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) at 0.00%. This indicates that FSZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSZRFEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

0.00%

+4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

3.51%

+7.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

8.39%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

16.76%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

17.53%

+1.22%

FSZ vs. RFEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than RFEU's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSZ vs. RFEU - Dividend Comparison

FSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than RFEU's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.38%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
2.83%2.87%5.45%3.37%4.98%1.82%2.32%3.08%2.84%1.35%3.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSZ and RFEU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSZ has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZ dropped -33.97% vs RFEU's -39.74%.

On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 10.25% vs 8.10% for RFEU. On fees, FSZ is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 10.25% return vs 8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSZ is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

RFEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.38% for FSZ.

Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FSZ and 0.83% for RFEU.

RFEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSZ and RFEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer