PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSZ vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSZ vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSZ achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FSZ has outperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 9.42%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.


FSZ

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.60%
YTD
2.04%
6M
6.03%
1Y
9.94%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
9.42%

NFTY

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
-9.70%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSZ vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.04%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-9.70%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FSZ and NFTY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2012

0.32

FSZ vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSZ
NFTY

Industrials

22.0%
8.3%

Healthcare

22.0%
9.7%

Financial Services

18.9%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
16.3%

Basic Materials

8.2%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
8.3%

Communication Services

3.9%
2.0%

Real Estate

3.7%

-

Utilities

3.1%
4.0%

Technology

1.6%
9.2%

Energy

-

8.5%

Industrials

FSZ
22.0%
NFTY
8.3%

Healthcare

FSZ
22.0%
NFTY
9.7%

Financial Services

FSZ
18.9%
NFTY
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FSZ
10.0%
NFTY
16.3%

Basic Materials

FSZ
8.2%
NFTY
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

FSZ
6.6%
NFTY
8.3%

Communication Services

FSZ
3.9%
NFTY
2.0%

Real Estate

FSZ
3.7%
NFTY

-

Utilities

FSZ
3.1%
NFTY
4.0%

Technology

FSZ
1.6%
NFTY
9.2%

Energy

FSZ

-

NFTY
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSZ vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSZ vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSZNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.91

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

-0.53

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

-1.39

+3.80

FSZ vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSZ and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSZNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

-0.58

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.27

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.39

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.28

+0.24

Drawdowns

FSZ vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSZ drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZ and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSZNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-47.67%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-16.14%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

-21.55%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

-21.55%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-47.67%

+13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-17.45%

+12.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-9.58%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

6.12%

-1.98%

Volatility

FSZ vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSZNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.58%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

12.57%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

14.72%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

17.39%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

20.72%

-1.77%

FSZ vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSZ and NFTY have an expense ratio of 0.80%.


Dividends

FSZ vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than NFTY's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.39%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.96%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSZ and NFTY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSZ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to NFTY (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZ dropped -33.97% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 9.42% vs 8.13% for NFTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSZ and NFTY have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.

FSZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.96% for NFTY.

FSZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index.

FSZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSZ and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer