FSZ vs. FLGB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSZ (First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund) and FLGB (Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FSZ tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index while FLGB tracks the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSZ returned 6.20%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for FLGB. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSZ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLGB.

Performance

FSZ vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSZ achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than FLGB's 4.59% return.

FSZ

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 11.07%
• 3Y*: 13.17%
• 5Y*: 6.20%
• 10Y*: 10.25%

FLGB

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: 4.59%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 18.93%
• 3Y*: 17.39%
• 5Y*: 10.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSZ vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund	2.53%	30.10%	-1.85%	21.30%	-20.12%	20.18%	13.83%	25.88%	-15.22%	1.99%
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	4.59%	33.73%	8.77%	14.33%	-6.00%	17.14%	-9.47%	23.23%	-11.60%	1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FSZ and FLGB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.67

The correlation between FSZ and FLGB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSZ vs. FLGB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSZ	FLGB
Financial Services	22.0%	27.1%
Industrials	17.1%	13.3%
Healthcare	14.6%	12.9%
Basic Materials	9.8%	8.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	13.9%
Technology	4.9%	0.6%
Communication Services	2.4%	2.5%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.8%
Utilities	2.4%	4.7%
Energy	-	10.2%

Return for Risk

FSZ vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSZ

FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 23
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FLGB

FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 39
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSZ vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSZ	FLGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.32	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	1.91	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.24	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	1.85	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.61	6.43	-3.81

FSZ vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSZ and FLGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSZ vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSZ drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum FLGB drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZ and FLGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSZ	FLGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.97%	-42.61%	+8.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.39%	-10.26%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.93%	-13.13%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.96%	-25.90%	-8.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.66%	-5.18%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.98%	-6.67%	-0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.24%	2.95%	+1.29%

Volatility

FSZ vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) have volatilities of 4.07% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSZ	FLGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	4.15%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.05%	12.36%	-1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.34%	14.49%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.35%	16.63%	+2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.75%	18.95%	-0.20%

FSZ vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSZ vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

FSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than FLGB's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	1.68%	3.50%	4.42%	3.95%	4.23%	2.93%	2.67%	4.30%	3.92%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund	2.38%	1.80%	1.80%	2.11%	3.50%	1.62%	1.53%	2.01%	2.29%	1.49%	1.93%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSZ and FLGB in my portfolio?

FSZ and FLGB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSZ or FLGB?

FLGB has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to FSZ (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZ dropped -33.97% vs FLGB's -42.61%.

Which ETF is better, FSZ or FLGB?

On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 10.74% vs 6.20% for FSZ. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSZ or FLGB?

Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSZ or FLGB?

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSZ or FLGB?

FSZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.68% for FLGB.

What is the main difference between FSZ and FLGB?

FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index, while FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FSZ and 0.09% for FLGB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.