FSYD vs. BBHY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSYD (Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FSYD is actively managed, while BBHY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FSYD returned 9.54%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for BBHY. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSYD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.

Performance

FSYD vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSYD achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.58% return.

FSYD

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 9.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBHY

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 7.15%
• 3Y*: 8.61%
• 5Y*: 4.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSYD vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	3.35%	9.09%	8.74%	12.22%	-6.59%
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.58%	8.51%	7.81%	11.98%	-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FSYD and BBHY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022	0.96

The correlation between FSYD and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSYD vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSYD	BBHY
Healthcare	94.6%	5.4%
Energy	34.4%	5.2%
Technology	5.4%	4.0%
Communication Services	0.0%	7.9%
Basic Materials	-	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Financial Services	-	4.1%
Industrials	-	8.4%
Real Estate	-	3.9%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

FSYD vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSYD

FSYD Risk / Return Rank: 79
FSYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FSYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FSYD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FSYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FSYD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

BBHY

BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 63
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSYD vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSYD	BBHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	1.98	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	3.01	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.39	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	3.02	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	13.58	+1.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSYD vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSYD Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSYD and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSYD	BBHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	1.98	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.64	+0.13

Drawdowns

FSYD vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSYD drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSYD and BBHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSYD	BBHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.11%	-24.98%	+12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.67%	-2.37%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.49%	-5.00%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.30%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-2.37%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.53%	+0.14%

Volatility

FSYD vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) have volatilities of 1.12% and 1.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSYD	BBHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	1.12%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	2.86%	+0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.12%	3.62%	+0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.85%	7.26%	+0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.85%	7.53%	+0.32%

FSYD vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSYD vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

FSYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than BBHY's 6.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.95%	7.24%	7.18%	6.49%	5.92%	4.06%	4.73%	4.99%	5.02%	4.81%	1.42%
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	6.32%	6.49%	6.47%	6.70%	5.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSYD and BBHY in my portfolio?

FSYD and BBHY have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSYD or BBHY?

BBHY has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to FSYD (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSYD dropped -12.11% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

Which ETF is better, FSYD or BBHY?

On 3-year performance, FSYD leads with 9.54% vs 8.61% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSYD or BBHY?

Over the 3-year period, FSYD has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSYD or BBHY?

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FSYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSYD or BBHY?

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 6.32% for FSYD.

What is the main difference between FSYD and BBHY?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FSYD and 0.15% for BBHY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.