FSVLX vs. FSPCX
FSVLX (Fidelity Select Fintech Portfolio) and FSPCX (Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio) are both Financials Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSVLX returned 6.89%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for FSPCX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSVLX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FSPCX.
Performance
FSVLX vs. FSPCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSVLX achieves a -14.98% return, which is significantly lower than FSPCX's 8.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FSVLX has underperformed FSPCX with an annualized return of 6.89%, while FSPCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.07% annualized return.
FSVLX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 9.99%
- 6M
- -14.36%
- YTD
- -14.98%
- 1Y
- -16.69%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- -3.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.89%
FSPCX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 14.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
FSVLX vs. FSPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSVLX Fidelity Select Fintech Portfolio | -14.98% | 0.26% | 22.04% | 24.55% | -29.75% | 22.31% | 2.25% | 34.18% | -10.51% | 23.13% |
FSPCX Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio | 8.14% | 3.45% | 28.44% | 12.98% | 7.75% | 29.26% | 0.00% | 30.06% | -11.99% | 15.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSVLX and FSPCX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1985 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSVLX and FSPCX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSVLX vs. FSPCX — Risk / Return Rank
FSVLX
FSPCX
FSVLX vs. FSPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Fintech Portfolio (FSVLX) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSVLX | FSPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.11 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 0.93 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 1.90 | -3.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSVLX vs. FSPCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSVLX drawdown since its inception was -83.84%, which is greater than FSPCX's maximum drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSVLX and FSPCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSVLX | FSPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.84% | -69.48% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.40% | -9.98% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.70% | -11.69% | -20.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.62% | -16.65% | -25.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.70% | -43.68% | -8.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.14% | -1.12% | -20.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -9.69% | -15.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 4.89% | +11.17% |
Volatility
FSVLX vs. FSPCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Fintech Portfolio (FSVLX) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX) at 5.61%. This indicates that FSVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSVLX | FSPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 5.61% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.42% | 12.06% | +7.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.08% | 15.99% | +7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 17.54% | +7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 20.05% | +5.77% |
FSVLX vs. FSPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSVLX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPCX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSVLX vs. FSPCX - Dividend Comparison
FSVLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSPCX Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio | 4.35% | 3.35% | 8.72% | 8.48% | 0.74% | 8.40% | 8.80% | 6.90% | 32.69% | 12.52% | 2.81% | 3.11% |
FSVLX Fidelity Select Fintech Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.25% | 1.93% | 1.77% | 8.59% | 1.58% | 3.84% | 10.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSVLX and FSPCX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSVLX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to FSPCX (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSVLX dropped -83.84% vs FSPCX's -69.48%.
FSPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSVLX and FSPCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer