FSUVX vs. RCKSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FSUVX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund) and RCKSX (Rock Oak Core Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSUVX returned 11.34%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for RCKSX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSUVX charges 0.11%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RCKSX.

Performance

FSUVX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSUVX achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 14.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSUVX having a 11.34% annualized return and RCKSX not far behind at 10.90%.

FSUVX

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 5.18%
• 6M: 5.47%
• 1Y: 12.53%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 9.48%
• 10Y*: 11.34%

RCKSX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 14.59%
• 6M: 14.70%
• 1Y: 20.99%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: 7.32%
• 10Y*: 10.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSUVX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSUVX Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund	5.18%	11.03%	17.40%	14.80%	-10.93%	21.51%	9.86%	27.73%	1.35%	17.68%
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	14.59%	12.99%	15.12%	15.57%	-18.09%	9.96%	13.75%	19.05%	-2.14%	22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FSUVX and RCKSX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2015	0.76

The correlation between FSUVX and RCKSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSUVX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSUVX

FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 26
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

RCKSX

RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 56
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSUVX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSUVX	RCKSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.80	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.61	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	5.02	-3.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.21	13.94	-6.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSUVX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSUVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSUVX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSUVX	RCKSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	1.80	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.47	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.62	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.38	+0.38

Drawdowns

FSUVX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSUVX drawdown since its inception was -32.41%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSUVX and RCKSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSUVX	RCKSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.41%	-57.88%	+25.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-4.14%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.55%	-18.22%	+6.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.48%	-22.54%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.41%	-33.10%	+0.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-0.17%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-9.50%	+6.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	1.49%	+0.23%

Volatility

FSUVX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) is 2.09%, while Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that FSUVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSUVX	RCKSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.09%	2.96%	-0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.25%	7.99%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.45%	11.56%	-3.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.96%	15.66%	-2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	17.54%	-2.36%

FSUVX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSUVX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSUVX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

FSUVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than RCKSX's 5.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSUVX Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund	4.23%	4.45%	2.25%	1.74%	4.12%	3.52%	1.31%	3.80%	2.63%	2.94%	2.23%	1.17%
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	5.46%	6.26%	0.47%	0.71%	1.00%	4.31%	16.56%	3.18%	0.59%	5.91%	0.70%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSUVX and RCKSX in my portfolio?

FSUVX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSUVX or RCKSX?

RCKSX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to FSUVX (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSUVX dropped -32.41% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RCKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.