PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTZX vs. DIPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTZX vs. DIPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) and DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio (DIPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTZX achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than DIPSX's 1.80% return.


FSTZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.09%
6M
2.02%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
10Y*

DIPSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.80%
6M
1.36%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
2.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTZX vs. DIPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
2.09%5.99%4.87%4.67%-2.83%1.32%
DIPSX
DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio
1.80%5.77%2.02%3.93%-12.26%1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTZX and DIPSX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.80

The correlation between FSTZX and DIPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTZX vs. DIPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTZX
FSTZX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FSTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DIPSX
DIPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DIPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
DIPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTZX vs. DIPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) and DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio (DIPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTZXDIPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.21

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.68

1.98

+4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.52

5.53

+18.99

FSTZX vs. DIPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the DIPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTZX and DIPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTZXDIPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.16

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.33

+0.87

Drawdowns

FSTZX vs. DIPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTZX drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, smaller than the maximum DIPSX drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTZX and DIPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTZXDIPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-14.64%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.70%

-2.03%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

-4.75%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-4.55%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

0.73%

-0.54%

Volatility

FSTZX vs. DIPSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) is 0.51%, while DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio (DIPSX) has a volatility of 0.87%. This indicates that FSTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTZXDIPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

0.87%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.09%

2.26%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64%

3.50%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

6.36%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.79%

5.71%

-2.92%

FSTZX vs. DIPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTZX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DIPSX's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSTZX vs. DIPSX - Dividend Comparison

FSTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than DIPSX's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIPSX
DFA Inflation-Protected Securities Portfolio
2.02%2.43%2.70%3.73%8.14%4.86%1.58%2.12%2.28%2.64%1.99%0.69%
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.64%4.02%2.78%2.54%5.25%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTZX and DIPSX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIPSX has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to FSTZX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTZX dropped -5.30% vs DIPSX's -14.64%.

FSTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTZX and DIPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer