PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTUX vs. MSIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTUX vs. MSIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dividend Income Fund (FSTUX) and Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTUX achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than MSIGX's 6.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTUX has underperformed MSIGX with an annualized return of 8.13%, while MSIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.


FSTUX

1D
1.05%
1M
0.94%
YTD
4.93%
6M
6.03%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
8.13%

MSIGX

1D
0.03%
1M
3.56%
YTD
6.01%
6M
6.04%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTUX vs. MSIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTUX
Invesco Dividend Income Fund
4.93%15.48%11.49%7.10%0.58%18.98%0.56%18.10%-7.45%8.88%
MSIGX
Invesco Main Street Fund
6.01%16.02%23.66%23.06%-20.21%27.37%14.41%22.49%-8.25%16.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTUX and MSIGX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 1988

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between FSTUX and MSIGX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTUX vs. MSIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTUX
FSTUX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FSTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MSIGX
MSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTUX vs. MSIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dividend Income Fund (FSTUX) and Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTUXMSIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.13

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

8.73

-0.24

FSTUX vs. MSIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the MSIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTUX and MSIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTUXMSIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.92

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.65

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.67

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.65

-0.25

Drawdowns

FSTUX vs. MSIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTUX drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than MSIGX's maximum drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTUX and MSIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTUXMSIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-57.22%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-10.96%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-19.91%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.18%

-26.73%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.89%

-35.41%

+3.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-0.39%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-8.99%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.56%

-0.55%

Volatility

FSTUX vs. MSIGX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dividend Income Fund (FSTUX) and Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTUXMSIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.66%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.40%

9.78%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.54%

12.16%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

16.90%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

17.89%

-3.37%

FSTUX vs. MSIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTUX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than MSIGX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTUX vs. MSIGX - Dividend Comparison

FSTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, more than MSIGX's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTUX
Invesco Dividend Income Fund
11.45%11.91%7.47%5.59%5.72%6.49%2.17%3.24%10.97%4.09%2.28%4.24%
MSIGX
Invesco Main Street Fund
7.07%7.50%6.06%7.40%4.68%19.19%3.17%0.89%19.62%7.50%2.96%13.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTUX and MSIGX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTUX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to MSIGX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTUX dropped -62.41% vs MSIGX's -57.22%.

MSIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTUX and MSIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer