FSTGX vs. LTUSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX).
FSTGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 1988. LTUSX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Nov 15, 1987.
Performance
FSTGX vs. LTUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSTGX vs. LTUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTGX Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund | -0.22% | 6.00% | 2.24% | 3.88% | -8.76% | -2.28% | 5.46% | 4.84% | 1.20% | 0.98% |
LTUSX Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund | 0.37% | 6.40% | 2.40% | 3.40% | -8.06% | -1.82% | 3.77% | 3.61% | 0.98% | 0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTGX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than LTUSX's 0.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSTGX having a 1.05% annualized return and LTUSX not far behind at 1.03%.
FSTGX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
LTUSX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- 1.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSTGX vs. LTUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LTUSX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSTGX vs. LTUSX — Risk / Return Rank
FSTGX
LTUSX
FSTGX vs. LTUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTGX | LTUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 2.00 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.47 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 7.64 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTGX | LTUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.19 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.34 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTGX and LTUSX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSTGX vs. LTUSX - Dividend Comparison
FSTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than LTUSX's 2.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTGX Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund | 2.84% | 3.04% | 2.94% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 0.77% | 2.65% | 1.85% | 1.84% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.69% |
LTUSX Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund | 2.32% | 2.69% | 2.62% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.21% | 1.35% | 1.77% | 1.90% | 1.45% | 2.52% | 1.50% |
Drawdowns
FSTGX vs. LTUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTGX drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, which is greater than LTUSX's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTGX and LTUSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTGX | LTUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.66% | -12.34% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.80% | -2.00% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.54% | -11.69% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.66% | -12.34% | -1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -1.60% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -1.40% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.65% | -0.08% |
Volatility
FSTGX vs. LTUSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) is 0.98%, while Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that FSTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSTGX | LTUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 1.24% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.74% | 1.99% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98% | 3.29% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.08% | 3.99% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 3.06% | +0.32% |