FSTEX vs. RMLPX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FSTEX (Invesco Energy Fund) and RMLPX (Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FSTEX returned 20.50%/yr vs 25.13%/yr for RMLPX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSTEX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RMLPX.

Performance

FSTEX vs. RMLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTEX achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly lower than RMLPX's 33.65% return.

FSTEX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -5.50%
• 6M: 19.89%
• YTD: 22.77%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 15.26%
• 5Y*: 20.50%
• 10Y*: 5.83%

RMLPX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.17%
• 6M: 32.04%
• YTD: 33.65%
• 1Y: 37.07%
• 3Y*: 28.67%
• 5Y*: 25.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTEX vs. RMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FSTEX Invesco Energy Fund	22.77%	12.31%	6.00%	0.28%	52.85%	55.99%	-32.13%	4.78%	-26.82%
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund	33.65%	8.98%	30.03%	16.79%	35.03%	42.56%	-28.37%	15.33%	-15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTEX and RMLPX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018	0.88

The correlation between FSTEX and RMLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSTEX vs. RMLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTEX

FSTEX Risk / Return Rank: 34
FSTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FSTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FSTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FSTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FSTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

RMLPX

RMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 83
RMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
RMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
RMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTEX vs. RMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSTEX	RMLPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.27	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	3.05	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.38	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	4.18	-2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.50	11.07	-5.57

FSTEX vs. RMLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the RMLPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTEX and RMLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSTEX vs. RMLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTEX drawdown since its inception was -83.31%, which is greater than RMLPX's maximum drawdown of -66.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTEX and RMLPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSTEX	RMLPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.31%	-66.95%	-16.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.54%	-9.09%	-7.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.58%	-18.75%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.88%	-22.83%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.07%	-4.27%	-7.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.16%	-10.20%	-14.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.98%	3.42%	+1.56%

Volatility

FSTEX vs. RMLPX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) at 6.26%. This indicates that FSTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSTEX	RMLPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.15%	6.26%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.20%	13.74%	+2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.70%	16.77%	+2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	21.35%	+3.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.60%	27.96%	+1.64%

FSTEX vs. RMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTEX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than RMLPX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSTEX vs. RMLPX - Dividend Comparison

FSTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than RMLPX's 4.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSTEX Invesco Energy Fund	1.81%	2.22%	4.03%	2.11%	0.89%	1.80%	2.21%	1.53%	3.05%	2.22%	1.10%	1.58%
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund	4.87%	6.38%	7.63%	6.49%	7.08%	8.89%	13.48%	7.25%	5.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSTEX and RMLPX in my portfolio?

FSTEX and RMLPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSTEX or RMLPX?

FSTEX has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to RMLPX (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTEX dropped -83.31% vs RMLPX's -66.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.