FSTEX vs. GAGEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX).
FSTEX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jan 18, 1984. GAGEX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 2004.
Performance
FSTEX vs. GAGEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSTEX vs. GAGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTEX Invesco Energy Fund | 38.85% | 12.31% | 6.00% | 0.28% | 52.85% | 55.99% | -32.13% | 4.78% | -26.82% | -8.26% |
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 38.71% | 16.88% | -1.75% | 2.66% | 34.32% | 45.96% | -34.12% | 10.45% | -18.96% | -1.04% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSTEX having a 38.85% return and GAGEX slightly lower at 38.71%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSTEX having a 8.77% annualized return and GAGEX not far ahead at 8.82%.
FSTEX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 13.19%
- YTD
- 38.85%
- 6M
- 42.88%
- 1Y
- 43.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 25.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
GAGEX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 13.36%
- YTD
- 38.71%
- 6M
- 42.07%
- 1Y
- 48.50%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 21.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSTEX vs. GAGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTEX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than GAGEX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSTEX vs. GAGEX — Risk / Return Rank
FSTEX
GAGEX
FSTEX vs. GAGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTEX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.04 | 2.31 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 2.80 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.62 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.35 | 9.35 | -0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTEX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 2.31 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.90 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.32 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.25 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTEX and GAGEX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSTEX vs. GAGEX - Dividend Comparison
FSTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than GAGEX's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTEX Invesco Energy Fund | 1.60% | 2.22% | 4.03% | 2.11% | 0.89% | 1.80% | 2.21% | 1.53% | 3.05% | 2.22% | 1.10% | 1.58% |
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 2.04% | 2.82% | 7.08% | 4.33% | 0.15% | 2.59% | 3.59% | 1.91% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.13% | 1.33% |
Drawdowns
FSTEX vs. GAGEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTEX drawdown since its inception was -83.31%, which is greater than GAGEX's maximum drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTEX and GAGEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTEX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.31% | -78.90% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.57% | -18.43% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.88% | -26.42% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.41% | -69.98% | -3.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.09% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -29.43% | +4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 5.18% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FSTEX vs. GAGEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) is 4.36%, while Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that FSTEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSTEX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.84% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 12.45% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.29% | 21.56% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.29% | 23.56% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.77% | 27.32% | +2.45% |