PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTDX vs. VCTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTDX vs. VCTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series 5+ Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTDX) and VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund (VCTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTDX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than VCTPX's 2.23% return.


FSTDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.50%
6M
0.69%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
2.89%
5Y*
10Y*

VCTPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.23%
6M
1.65%
1Y
6.17%
3Y*
3.06%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
2.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTDX vs. VCTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSTDX
Fidelity Series 5+ Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
1.50%7.38%-0.43%2.84%-19.06%2.10%
VCTPX
VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund
2.23%4.22%1.15%4.03%-10.23%2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTDX and VCTPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.94

The correlation between FSTDX and VCTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTDX vs. VCTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTDX
FSTDX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FSTDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VCTPX
VCTPX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VCTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VCTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTDX vs. VCTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series 5+ Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTDX) and VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund (VCTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTDXVCTPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.32

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

9.00

-4.36

FSTDX vs. VCTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the VCTPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTDX and VCTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTDXVCTPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.96

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

0.26

-0.44

Drawdowns

FSTDX vs. VCTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTDX drawdown since its inception was -24.29%, which is greater than VCTPX's maximum drawdown of -17.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTDX and VCTPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTDXVCTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.29%

-17.48%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.60%

-1.84%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.73%

-5.19%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.45%

0.00%

-10.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.04%

-5.84%

-8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

0.68%

+0.58%

Volatility

FSTDX vs. VCTPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series 5+ Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTDX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund (VCTPX) at 0.88%. This indicates that FSTDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTDXVCTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

0.88%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.63%

2.15%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

3.12%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

5.60%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.46%

4.86%

+4.60%

FSTDX vs. VCTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VCTPX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTDX vs. VCTPX - Dividend Comparison

FSTDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than VCTPX's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTDX
Fidelity Series 5+ Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.98%4.38%3.58%3.28%6.69%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCTPX
VALIC Company I Inflation Protected Fund
2.56%0.00%13.97%13.35%8.00%1.86%2.20%1.63%1.98%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FSTDX and VCTPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSTDX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to VCTPX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTDX dropped -24.29% vs VCTPX's -17.48%.

VCTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTDX and VCTPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer