PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTBX vs. FHYTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTBX vs. FHYTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Global Allocation Fund (FSTBX) and Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund (FHYTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTBX achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly higher than FHYTX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTBX has outperformed FHYTX with an annualized return of 7.28%, while FHYTX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.29% annualized return.


FSTBX

1D
0.38%
1M
3.80%
YTD
8.08%
6M
9.07%
1Y
20.47%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
7.28%

FHYTX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.05%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.43%
1Y
7.36%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
6.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTBX vs. FHYTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTBX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation Fund
8.08%16.61%9.08%11.22%-15.42%8.54%12.56%17.87%-8.60%17.06%
FHYTX
Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund
1.50%8.40%6.24%13.22%-13.45%7.37%6.72%15.34%-4.66%7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTBX and FHYTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.66

The correlation between FSTBX and FHYTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTBX vs. FHYTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTBX
FSTBX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FHYTX
FHYTX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FHYTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTBX vs. FHYTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Global Allocation Fund (FSTBX) and Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund (FHYTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTBXFHYTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.48

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.67

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.24

12.71

-3.47

FSTBX vs. FHYTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FHYTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTBX and FHYTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTBXFHYTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.03

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.56

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.87

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.08

-0.49

Drawdowns

FSTBX vs. FHYTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTBX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum FHYTX drawdown of -34.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTBX and FHYTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTBXFHYTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-34.98%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-2.76%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.88%

-4.12%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

-17.04%

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-24.18%

-7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-4.52%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

0.58%

+1.64%

Volatility

FSTBX vs. FHYTX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Global Allocation Fund (FSTBX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund (FHYTX) at 1.21%. This indicates that FSTBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTBXFHYTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

1.21%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

2.88%

+7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

3.65%

+7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

5.68%

+8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.01%

7.28%

+5.73%

FSTBX vs. FHYTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTBX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYTX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTBX vs. FHYTX - Dividend Comparison

FSTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than FHYTX's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHYTX
Federated Hermes Opportunistic High Yield Bond Fund
5.22%5.19%4.91%5.42%4.40%3.95%4.67%5.01%6.71%4.68%14.56%5.28%
FSTBX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation Fund
5.90%6.35%2.01%1.53%1.72%15.46%2.28%2.55%5.79%1.43%1.87%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTBX and FHYTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTBX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to FHYTX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTBX dropped -31.34% vs FHYTX's -34.98%.

FHYTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTBX and FHYTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer