PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTAX vs. FANCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTAX vs. FANCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FSTAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.74%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.41%
1Y
9.04%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
4.00%

FANCX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.01%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
0.34%
1Y
2.40%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTAX vs. FANCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A
3.02%8.68%4.93%8.82%-11.98%3.22%7.21%10.74%-2.94%7.63%
FANCX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C
-0.00%4.38%3.74%3.91%-4.63%-1.81%2.74%2.90%0.23%-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTAX and FANCX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2016

0.50

The correlation between FSTAX and FANCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTAX vs. FANCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTAX
FSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FANCX
FANCX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FANCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FANCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FANCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FANCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FANCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTAX vs. FANCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTAXFANCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.33

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

2.16

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.45

6.87

+8.58

FSTAX vs. FANCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the FANCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTAX and FANCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTAXFANCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

1.43

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.54

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.60

-0.09

Drawdowns

FSTAX vs. FANCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTAX drawdown since its inception was -23.29%, which is greater than FANCX's maximum drawdown of -7.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTAX and FANCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTAXFANCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.29%

-7.79%

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-1.18%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.04%

-1.18%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.18%

-7.35%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.57%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-1.56%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.37%

+0.24%

Volatility

FSTAX vs. FANCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX) at 0.49%. This indicates that FSTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTAXFANCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

0.49%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

1.24%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

1.78%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.49%

2.12%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.44%

1.77%

+2.67%

FSTAX vs. FANCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than FANCX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTAX vs. FANCX - Dividend Comparison

FSTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than FANCX's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FANCX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C
3.11%3.20%2.95%1.75%0.15%0.36%1.68%1.00%0.69%0.21%0.07%0.00%
FSTAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A
4.01%4.05%3.21%3.70%2.70%4.01%4.32%4.06%3.50%3.70%3.49%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTAX and FANCX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTAX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to FANCX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTAX dropped -23.29% vs FANCX's -7.79%.

FSTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTAX and FANCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer