PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSSZX vs. WEMMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSSZX vs. WEMMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class Z (FSSZX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSSZX achieves a 21.20% return, which is significantly lower than WEMMX's 25.94% return.


FSSZX

1D
1.20%
1M
5.10%
YTD
21.20%
6M
18.42%
1Y
42.34%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*

WEMMX

1D
-0.17%
1M
7.72%
YTD
25.94%
6M
23.70%
1Y
39.03%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSSZX vs. WEMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSSZX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class Z
21.20%14.49%14.62%19.60%-18.17%24.90%21.91%30.62%-8.79%9.74%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
25.94%11.02%3.83%13.53%-15.37%21.44%10.02%16.94%-13.69%16.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FSSZX and WEMMX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FSSZX and WEMMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSSZX vs. WEMMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSSZX
FSSZX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FSSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

WEMMX
WEMMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WEMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
WEMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSSZX vs. WEMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class Z (FSSZX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSSZXWEMMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

4.38

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.01

13.47

+3.54

FSSZX vs. WEMMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSSZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the WEMMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSSZX and WEMMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSSZX vs. WEMMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSSZX drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, smaller than the maximum WEMMX drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSSZX and WEMMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSSZXWEMMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

-42.48%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-9.31%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-21.44%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.51%

-27.11%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.17%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-6.61%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.02%

-0.42%

Volatility

FSSZX vs. WEMMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class Z (FSSZX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) at 5.28%. This indicates that FSSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSSZXWEMMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

5.28%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.01%

12.88%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.48%

17.99%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

19.00%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

20.49%

+1.83%

FSSZX vs. WEMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSSZX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than WEMMX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSSZX vs. WEMMX - Dividend Comparison

FSSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than WEMMX's 18.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSSZX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class Z
0.69%0.84%2.93%0.35%0.15%10.95%1.40%2.29%22.58%10.60%0.00%0.00%
WEMMX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund
18.11%22.80%26.79%18.86%13.60%15.44%9.23%4.11%4.16%6.44%4.61%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSSZX and WEMMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSSZX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to WEMMX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSSZX dropped -38.43% vs WEMMX's -42.48%.

FSSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSSZX and WEMMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer