PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSSZX vs. PRCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSSZX vs. PRCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class Z (FSSZX) and Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund (PRCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FSSZX

1D
1.70%
1M
-0.55%
6M
13.47%
YTD
19.91%
1Y
37.65%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.56%

PRCGX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSSZX vs. PRCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSSZX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class Z
19.91%14.49%14.62%19.60%-18.17%24.90%21.91%30.62%-8.79%9.74%
PRCGX
Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund
13.20%8.36%10.29%12.07%-16.05%31.15%8.88%9.37%-17.61%10.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FSSZX and PRCGX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FSSZX and PRCGX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSSZX vs. PRCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSSZX
FSSZX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FSSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCGX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSSZX vs. PRCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class Z (FSSZX) and Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund (PRCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSSZXPRCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

FSSZX vs. PRCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSSZX vs. PRCGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSSZXPRCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

Volatility

FSSZX vs. PRCGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSSZXPRCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

FSSZX vs. PRCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSSZX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCGX's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSSZX vs. PRCGX - Dividend Comparison

FSSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than PRCGX's 12.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSSZX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class Z
0.70%0.84%2.93%0.35%0.15%10.95%1.40%2.29%22.58%10.60%0.00%0.00%
PRCGX
Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Fund
12.01%8.78%8.28%7.34%3.26%15.00%0.00%3.50%14.70%28.27%9.03%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSSZX and PRCGX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSSZX and PRCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer