PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSSKX vs. FGCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSSKX vs. FGCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX) and Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSSKX achieves a 15.87% return, which is significantly lower than FGCKX's 23.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FSSKX has underperformed FGCKX with an annualized return of 15.45%, while FGCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.10% annualized return.


FSSKX

1D
0.34%
1M
5.90%
YTD
15.87%
6M
16.43%
1Y
37.51%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
15.45%

FGCKX

1D
0.05%
1M
8.79%
YTD
23.78%
6M
20.00%
1Y
48.64%
3Y*
31.78%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
23.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSSKX vs. FGCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSSKX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K
15.87%18.98%19.89%27.04%-19.47%23.28%25.01%32.33%-8.52%24.38%
FGCKX
Fidelity Growth Company K
23.78%18.67%37.30%47.35%-33.82%22.62%67.61%38.50%-4.07%36.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FSSKX and FGCKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.92

The correlation between FSSKX and FGCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSSKX vs. FGCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSSKX
FSSKX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FSSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FGCKX
FGCKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FGCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FGCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSSKX vs. FGCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX) and Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSSKXFGCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.46

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

4.03

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.28

15.19

+5.10

FSSKX vs. FGCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSSKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the FGCKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSSKX and FGCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSSKXFGCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.75

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.74

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.99

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.72

-0.17

Drawdowns

FSSKX vs. FGCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSSKX drawdown since its inception was -53.43%, roughly equal to the maximum FGCKX drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSSKX and FGCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSSKXFGCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.43%

-51.01%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-12.55%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.84%

-26.20%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-40.21%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

-40.21%

+5.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-8.96%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

3.32%

-1.42%

Volatility

FSSKX vs. FGCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX) is 3.37%, while Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that FSSKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSSKXFGCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

4.39%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

14.40%

-4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

18.43%

-5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

24.02%

-6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

23.43%

-4.84%

FSSKX vs. FGCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSSKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FGCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSSKX vs. FGCKX - Dividend Comparison

FSSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while FGCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGCKX
Fidelity Growth Company K
0.00%0.00%8.80%3.81%7.16%10.63%8.83%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.20%3.96%
FSSKX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K
4.12%4.78%4.87%2.11%0.38%1.44%5.29%6.17%4.37%3.07%1.12%5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FSSKX and FGCKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGCKX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to FSSKX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSSKX dropped -53.43% vs FGCKX's -51.01%.

FSSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSSKX and FGCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer