FSSGX vs. GMAQX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FSSGX (Fidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and GMAQX (GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, FSSGX returned 25.27%/yr vs 30.57%/yr for GMAQX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSSGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for GMAQX.

Performance

FSSGX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSSGX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSSGX achieves a 27.23% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 45.04% return.

FSSGX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: 27.23%
• 6M: 28.28%
• 1Y: 49.92%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMAQX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -1.98%
• YTD: 45.04%
• 6M: 47.46%
• 1Y: 70.13%
• 3Y*: 30.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSSGX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FSSGX Fidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund	27.23%	38.40%	7.34%	11.67%	-7.56%
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	45.04%	32.09%	0.62%	27.41%	-9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FSSGX and GMAQX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2022	0.82

The correlation between FSSGX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSSGX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSSGX

FSSGX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FSSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FSSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FSSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FSSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FSSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

GMAQX

GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 94
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSSGX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSSGX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSSGX	GMAQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	3.00	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.85	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.63	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	5.15	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.50	17.99	-4.49

FSSGX vs. GMAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the GMAQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSSGX and GMAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSSGX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSSGX drawdown since its inception was -24.11%, smaller than the maximum GMAQX drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSSGX and GMAQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSSGX	GMAQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.11%	-41.97%	+17.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.47%	-13.77%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.80%	-19.64%	+3.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.25%	-8.18%	+2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-16.59%	+11.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	3.93%	-0.19%

Volatility

FSSGX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FSSGX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) have volatilities of 12.43% and 12.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSSGX	GMAQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.43%	12.79%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.11%	21.88%	-1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.46%	23.70%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.87%	17.89%	+1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.87%	17.89%	+1.98%

FSSGX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSSGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSSGX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison

FSSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than GMAQX's 6.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FSSGX Fidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund	2.25%	2.87%	3.83%	1.01%	0.88%	0.00%
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	6.50%	9.43%	32.28%	6.76%	4.94%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSSGX and GMAQX in my portfolio?

FSSGX and GMAQX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSSGX or GMAQX?

GMAQX has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to FSSGX (12.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSSGX dropped -24.11% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.