PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSSAX vs. QUSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSSAX vs. QUSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund (FSSAX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Small Cap Fund (QUSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSSAX achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than QUSIX's 1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FSSAX has outperformed QUSIX with an annualized return of 12.86%, while QUSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.


FSSAX

1D
-1.13%
1M
3.30%
YTD
11.59%
6M
8.94%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
12.86%

QUSIX

1D
-1.33%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.54%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSSAX vs. QUSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSSAX
Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund
11.59%7.88%13.02%31.05%-30.29%-0.24%41.68%42.14%-3.08%21.32%
QUSIX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Small Cap Fund
1.20%26.42%-1.98%21.28%-17.13%15.56%6.67%20.71%-18.81%33.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FSSAX and QUSIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSSAX vs. QUSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSSAX
FSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

QUSIX
QUSIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
QUSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
QUSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSSAX vs. QUSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund (FSSAX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Small Cap Fund (QUSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSSAXQUSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.12

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

0.67

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

1.80

+6.94

FSSAX vs. QUSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the QUSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSSAX and QUSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSSAX vs. QUSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSSAX drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, which is greater than QUSIX's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSSAX and QUSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSSAXQUSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.61%

-42.87%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-12.09%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.48%

-14.33%

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.58%

-32.21%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.80%

-42.87%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-7.59%

+6.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-8.50%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.51%

-1.37%

Volatility

FSSAX vs. QUSIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund (FSSAX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Small Cap Fund (QUSIX) at 3.74%. This indicates that FSSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSSAXQUSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

3.74%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

10.57%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.17%

12.90%

+6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.44%

14.40%

+10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.95%

14.19%

+9.76%

FSSAX vs. QUSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSSAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than QUSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSSAX vs. QUSIX - Dividend Comparison

FSSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than QUSIX's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSSAX
Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund
6.85%7.64%0.00%0.00%0.54%16.49%9.31%12.17%22.72%1.77%0.00%1.92%
QUSIX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Small Cap Fund
2.89%2.92%3.28%2.48%4.90%2.43%3.89%2.96%5.09%3.00%2.06%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSSAX and QUSIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSSAX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to QUSIX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSSAX dropped -59.61% vs QUSIX's -42.87%.

FSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSSAX and QUSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer