FSRRX vs. SIFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX).
FSRRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 7, 2005. SIFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2012.
Performance
FSRRX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSRRX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 5.76% | 10.45% | 5.84% | 4.59% | -3.34% | 15.84% | 3.74% | 10.48% | -3.99% | 3.00% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 9.34% | 7.82% | 4.08% | -1.74% | 8.48% | 10.83% | -1.59% | 5.68% | -3.64% | -1.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRRX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 9.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRRX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 5.75%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.95% annualized return.
FSRRX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- 1Y
- 13.17%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.75%
SIFAX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 11.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSRRX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSRRX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRRX
SIFAX
FSRRX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSRRX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 2.19 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 3.07 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.43 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 3.74 | -1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 9.56 | +2.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSRRX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.19 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 1.27 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.77 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.36 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRRX and SIFAX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSRRX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison
FSRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than SIFAX's 4.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 4.43% | 4.68% | 4.82% | 5.29% | 7.31% | 5.35% | 2.25% | 3.05% | 9.39% | 1.57% | 2.34% | 1.75% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 4.16% | 4.55% | 3.25% | 3.82% | 11.90% | 7.89% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 1.90% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
FSRRX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRRX drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRRX and SIFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRRX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.42% | -23.62% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -3.07% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.78% | -8.32% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.93% | -14.69% | -5.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -8.65% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.25% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FSRRX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) is 1.68%, while SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that FSRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSRRX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 2.03% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.87% | 3.91% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.32% | 5.30% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 5.50% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.73% | 5.16% | +1.57% |