FSQIX vs. GQJPX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Sustainable International Equity Fund (FSQIX) and GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX).

FSQIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 10, 2022. GQJPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021.

Performance

FSQIX vs. GQJPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable International Equity Fund (FSQIX) and GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSQIX vs. GQJPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FSQIX Fidelity Sustainable International Equity Fund	-4.75%	26.26%	7.85%	13.35%	-16.42%
GQJPX GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund	3.87%	24.88%	7.39%	18.06%	-13.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSQIX achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly lower than GQJPX's 3.87% return.

FSQIX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -12.46%
• YTD: -4.75%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 17.62%
• 3Y*: 11.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GQJPX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -7.07%
• YTD: 3.87%
• 6M: 9.04%
• 1Y: 17.20%
• 3Y*: 17.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSQIX vs. GQJPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSQIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GQJPX's 0.91% expense ratio.

FSQIX

Fidelity Sustainable International Equity Fund

GQJPX

GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund

Return for Risk

FSQIX vs. GQJPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSQIX

FSQIX Risk / Return Rank: 40
FSQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FSQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FSQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FSQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FSQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

GQJPX

GQJPX Risk / Return Rank: 74
GQJPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
GQJPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
GQJPX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GQJPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GQJPX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSQIX vs. GQJPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable International Equity Fund (FSQIX) and GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSQIX	GQJPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.39	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.81	-0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.28	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	1.71	-0.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.41	6.57	-2.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSQIX vs. GQJPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSQIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the GQJPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSQIX and GQJPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSQIX	GQJPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	1.39	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.68	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between FSQIX and GQJPX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FSQIX vs. GQJPX - Dividend Comparison

FSQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than GQJPX's 3.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FSQIX Fidelity Sustainable International Equity Fund	2.26%	2.15%	1.93%	1.62%	0.54%	0.00%
GQJPX GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund	3.10%	3.22%	3.35%	4.50%	5.59%	1.75%

Drawdowns

FSQIX vs. GQJPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSQIX drawdown since its inception was -27.85%, which is greater than GQJPX's maximum drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSQIX and GQJPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSQIX	GQJPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.85%	-21.83%	-6.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.26%	-8.78%	-4.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.94%	-7.28%	-5.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.69%	-5.58%	-2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	2.46%	+0.96%

Volatility

FSQIX vs. GQJPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable International Equity Fund (FSQIX) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX) at 5.40%. This indicates that FSQIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQJPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSQIX	GQJPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.07%	5.40%	+2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	8.01%	+4.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.82%	12.39%	+6.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	13.05%	+4.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	13.05%	+4.24%