PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPWX vs. FSTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSPWX vs. FSTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSPWX vs. FSTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPWX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FSTZX's 1.02% return.


FSPWX

1D
0.70%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.41%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSTZX

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.30%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSPWX vs. FSTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPWX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTZX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FSPWX vs. FSTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPWX
FSPWX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FSPWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTZX
FSTZX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPWX vs. FSTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSPWXFSTZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

2.05

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

3.11

-1.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.45

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

4.22

-2.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.38

14.91

-10.53

FSPWX vs. FSTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the FSTZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPWX and FSTZX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSPWXFSTZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.05

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.14

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between FSPWX and FSTZX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FSPWX vs. FSTZX - Dividend Comparison

FSPWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than FSTZX's 3.98% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
FSPWX
Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
4.17%4.19%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.98%4.02%2.78%2.54%5.25%0.82%

Drawdowns

FSPWX vs. FSTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPWX drawdown since its inception was -3.84%, smaller than the maximum FSTZX drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPWX and FSTZX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPWXFSTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-5.30%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-1.03%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.30%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-1.13%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.29%

+0.65%

Volatility

FSPWX vs. FSTZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) at 0.58%. This indicates that FSPWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSPWXFSTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

0.58%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

1.07%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

1.99%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.17%

2.83%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

2.83%

+1.34%