PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPHX vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPHX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPHX achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 29.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FSPHX has outperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 10.26%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.


FSPHX

1D
1.35%
1M
13.97%
6M
11.14%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
10.26%

FSENX

1D
-1.17%
1M
-3.32%
6M
24.62%
YTD
29.54%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
21.97%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPHX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
13.09%9.36%4.91%4.13%-12.82%11.58%24.57%31.48%7.15%23.83%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
29.54%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPHX and FSENX is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 1981

0.40

The correlation between FSPHX and FSENX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPHX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPHX
FSPHX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FSPHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPHX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSPHXFSENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

3.01

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

8.25

-5.37

FSPHX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPHX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSPHX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, smaller than the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPHX and FSENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPHXFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

-76.24%

+31.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.32%

-12.22%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-25.85%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-28.02%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.31%

-72.11%

+42.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.95%

+8.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-16.99%

+7.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.60%

4.44%

+4.16%

Volatility

FSPHX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) is 5.35%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that FSPHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPHXFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

6.55%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

15.94%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

19.95%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

27.17%

-8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

30.85%

-11.83%

FSPHX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPHX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSPHX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

FSPHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.77%, more than FSENX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.65%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
10.77%4.16%10.77%0.00%2.13%9.06%11.29%1.35%9.02%2.27%0.18%11.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSPHX and FSENX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSENX has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to FSPHX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPHX dropped -44.45% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPHX and FSENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer