PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSNZX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSNZX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K (FSNZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSNZX having a 13.49% return and FQLSX slightly higher at 14.07%.


FSNZX

1D
0.58%
1M
4.97%
YTD
13.49%
6M
15.34%
1Y
30.88%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*

FQLSX

1D
0.65%
1M
5.43%
YTD
14.07%
6M
15.67%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSNZX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSNZX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K
13.49%23.75%14.20%20.66%-18.25%16.70%18.36%25.55%-8.89%7.39%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
14.07%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%25.96%-8.31%7.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FSNZX and FQLSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FSNZX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSNZX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSNZX
FSNZX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FSNZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSNZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSNZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FSNZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSNZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSNZX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K (FSNZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSNZXFQLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.36

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.55

14.85

-0.30

FSNZX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSNZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSNZX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSNZXFQLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.54

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.75

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.78

-0.04

Drawdowns

FSNZX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSNZX drawdown since its inception was -30.92%, roughly equal to the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNZX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSNZXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.92%

-31.26%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-9.48%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

-15.37%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.30%

-27.41%

+0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-5.43%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.14%

+0.01%

Volatility

FSNZX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K (FSNZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSNZXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

4.13%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

10.29%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

12.54%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

15.12%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

16.08%

-0.12%

FSNZX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSNZX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSNZX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

FSNZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than FQLSX's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.59%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%
FSNZX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund Class K
5.81%4.41%2.26%1.99%12.13%12.05%5.08%6.60%7.94%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FSNZX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to FSNZX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSNZX dropped -30.92% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSNZX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer