PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSNKX vs. FRHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSNKX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K (FSNKX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSNKX achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than FRHMX's 1,464,383.96% return.


FSNKX

1D
0.65%
1M
1.45%
YTD
5.55%
6M
5.83%
1Y
12.38%
3Y*
8.83%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*

FRHMX

1D
1,410,365.12%
1M
1,421,616.96%
YTD
1,464,383.96%
6M
1,467,636.20%
1Y
1,547,810.54%
3Y*
2,494.75%
5Y*
596.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSNKX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSNKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K
5.55%11.42%5.33%9.94%-13.18%5.67%11.22%4.65%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
1,464,383.96%10.02%4.50%8.28%-11.48%2.98%8.79%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FSNKX and FRHMX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FSNKX and FRHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSNKX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSNKX
FSNKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FSNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FSNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHMX
FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSNKX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K (FSNKX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSNKXFRHMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-488,363.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

68,097.73

-68,096.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

470,348.34

-470,345.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.38

1,985,653.35

-1,985,639.97

FSNKX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSNKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSNKX and FRHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSNKX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSNKX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNKX and FRHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSNKXFRHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-15.96%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-3.42%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.76%

-4.90%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.31%

-15.96%

-2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-3.49%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.81%

+0.12%

Volatility

FSNKX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K (FSNKX) is 2.46%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) has a volatility of 955.41%. This indicates that FSNKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSNKXFRHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

955.41%

-952.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.69%

955.40%

-950.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

1,413,171.78%

-1,413,166.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.46%

631,989.64%

-631,983.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

538,904.02%

-538,897.55%

FSNKX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSNKX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSNKX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

FSNKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than FRHMX's 103.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
103.07%3.22%3.24%3.02%4.77%3.78%2.61%1.95%0.00%0.00%
FSNKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K
4.67%4.99%3.05%2.83%7.28%9.36%6.05%5.83%7.26%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FSNKX and FRHMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRHMX has higher volatility (955.41%) compared to FSNKX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSNKX dropped -18.31% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.

FSNKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSNKX and FRHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer