FSMUX vs. FCMAX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FSMUX (Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund) and FCMAX (Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSMUX returned 0.42%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FCMAX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSMUX charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FCMAX.

Performance

FSMUX vs. FCMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) and Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A (FCMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMUX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than FCMAX's 1.19% return.

FSMUX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 1.23%
• YTD: 1.69%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: 3.72%
• 5Y*: 0.42%
• 10Y*: —

FCMAX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 0.54%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: 3.66%
• 5Y*: 0.49%
• 10Y*: 1.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMUX vs. FCMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund	1.69%	3.14%	2.99%	6.78%	-11.25%	0.39%
FCMAX Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A	1.19%	5.28%	1.20%	5.85%	-9.83%	0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMUX and FCMAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021	0.87

The correlation between FSMUX and FCMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSMUX vs. FCMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMUX

FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FCMAX

FCMAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FCMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FCMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FCMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FCMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FCMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMUX vs. FCMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) and Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A (FCMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSMUX	FCMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.31	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.05	3.44	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.57	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	1.91	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.44	6.06	+4.37

FSMUX vs. FCMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FCMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMUX and FCMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSMUX vs. FCMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMUX drawdown since its inception was -16.27%, roughly equal to the maximum FCMAX drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMUX and FCMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMUX	FCMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.27%	-16.96%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	-3.41%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.95%	-5.54%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.27%	-14.38%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-1.00%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-3.08%	-2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.70%	1.07%	-0.37%

Volatility

FSMUX vs. FCMAX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A (FCMAX) at 0.54%. This indicates that FSMUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMUX	FCMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	0.54%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	2.23%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10%	2.82%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.63%	3.97%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.60%	4.04%	+0.56%

FSMUX vs. FCMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMUX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FCMAX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSMUX vs. FCMAX - Dividend Comparison

FSMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than FCMAX's 2.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCMAX Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class A	2.72%	3.43%	2.09%	2.15%	1.44%	1.86%	2.46%	2.50%	2.68%	3.18%	3.13%	2.72%
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund	3.00%	3.26%	3.74%	3.18%	2.14%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMUX and FCMAX in my portfolio?

FSMUX and FCMAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSMUX or FCMAX?

FSMUX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to FCMAX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMUX dropped -16.27% vs FCMAX's -16.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.