PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMUX vs. DUMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMUX vs. DUMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) and Dupree Mississippi Tax-Free Income Series (DUMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMUX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than DUMSX's 2.07% return.


FSMUX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.83%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
10Y*

DUMSX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.07%
6M
2.80%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMUX vs. DUMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
1.47%3.14%2.99%6.78%-11.25%0.39%
DUMSX
Dupree Mississippi Tax-Free Income Series
2.07%6.98%2.35%5.16%-7.10%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMUX and DUMSX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021

0.75

The correlation between FSMUX and DUMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMUX vs. DUMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMUX
FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DUMSX
DUMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DUMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DUMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMUX vs. DUMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) and Dupree Mississippi Tax-Free Income Series (DUMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMUXDUMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

2.15

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.70

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.49

16.51

-5.02

FSMUX vs. DUMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the DUMSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMUX and DUMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMUXDUMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

3.11

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

1.13

-1.02

Drawdowns

FSMUX vs. DUMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMUX drawdown since its inception was -16.27%, which is greater than DUMSX's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMUX and DUMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMUXDUMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.27%

-11.62%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-2.42%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

-6.08%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-1.58%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.54%

+1.29%

Volatility

FSMUX vs. DUMSX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to Dupree Mississippi Tax-Free Income Series (DUMSX) at 0.86%. This indicates that FSMUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMUXDUMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

0.86%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

2.07%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

2.88%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.64%

4.19%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

3.88%

+0.76%

FSMUX vs. DUMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMUX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DUMSX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMUX vs. DUMSX - Dividend Comparison

FSMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than DUMSX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUMSX
Dupree Mississippi Tax-Free Income Series
5.05%6.09%4.79%3.25%3.22%3.19%3.11%3.72%4.66%4.12%2.94%3.01%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
2.99%3.26%3.74%3.18%2.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMUX and DUMSX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMUX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to DUMSX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMUX dropped -16.27% vs DUMSX's -11.62%.

DUMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMUX and DUMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer