PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMTX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMTX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund (FSMTX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMTX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 11.56% return.


FSMTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.55%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*

FNILX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.04%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.44%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMTX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSMTX
Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund
0.57%7.65%2.93%7.33%-13.30%-0.30%8.13%9.87%1.41%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
11.56%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMTX and FNILX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018

0.10

The correlation between FSMTX and FNILX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMTX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMTX
FSMTX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FSMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMTX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund (FSMTX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMTXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.28

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

15.01

-8.82

FSMTX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMTX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMTXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.48

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.82

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.76

-0.20

Drawdowns

FSMTX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMTX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMTX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMTXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-33.76%

+15.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-9.01%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

-19.08%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

-25.40%

+7.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-5.37%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.97%

-1.01%

Volatility

FSMTX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund (FSMTX) is 1.36%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that FSMTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMTXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

2.88%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

8.99%

-6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

11.93%

-8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

17.25%

-11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.22%

20.04%

-14.82%

FSMTX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMTX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMTX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FSMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%
FSMTX
Fidelity SAI Total Bond Fund
4.56%4.56%4.70%4.29%2.59%2.74%5.36%4.93%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMTX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNILX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to FSMTX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMTX dropped -17.89% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMTX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer