PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMEX vs. GGHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMEX vs. GGHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMEX achieves a -17.61% return, which is significantly lower than GGHCX's -7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FSMEX has outperformed GGHCX with an annualized return of 9.47%, while GGHCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.18% annualized return.


FSMEX

1D
-1.64%
1M
2.05%
YTD
-17.61%
6M
-18.69%
1Y
-11.90%
3Y*
0.79%
5Y*
-0.96%
10Y*
9.47%

GGHCX

1D
-1.62%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-7.49%
6M
-9.37%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
6.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMEX vs. GGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMEX
Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio
-17.61%8.13%18.37%0.62%-24.84%24.56%30.18%29.58%15.98%26.66%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
-7.49%15.48%3.96%3.05%-13.53%12.05%14.52%32.01%0.27%15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMEX and GGHCX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 1998

0.81

The correlation between FSMEX and GGHCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMEX vs. GGHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMEX
FSMEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FSMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GGHCX
GGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMEX vs. GGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMEXGGHCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.08

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

0.44

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

1.02

-2.11

FSMEX vs. GGHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the GGHCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMEX and GGHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMEXGGHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

0.46

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.15

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.36

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.57

+0.08

Drawdowns

FSMEX vs. GGHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMEX drawdown since its inception was -40.34%, roughly equal to the maximum GGHCX drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMEX and GGHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMEXGGHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.34%

-40.23%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.28%

-13.53%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.28%

-16.86%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.34%

-25.37%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.34%

-29.34%

-11.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.84%

-11.85%

-10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-8.82%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

5.80%

+5.01%

Volatility

FSMEX vs. GGHCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) at 4.40%. This indicates that FSMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMEXGGHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

4.40%

+2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

10.12%

+4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.08%

13.09%

+4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

15.53%

+5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

17.45%

+3.31%

FSMEX vs. GGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMEX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GGHCX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMEX vs. GGHCX - Dividend Comparison

FSMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.03%, more than GGHCX's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMEX
Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio
22.03%10.53%17.04%0.00%1.80%8.12%6.65%1.77%7.47%6.26%5.84%16.35%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
6.15%5.69%5.17%0.00%0.00%24.69%6.44%3.51%8.81%6.88%2.24%15.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMEX and GGHCX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMEX has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to GGHCX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMEX dropped -40.34% vs GGHCX's -40.23%.

GGHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMEX and GGHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer