PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMEX vs. FSPHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMEX vs. FSPHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) and Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMEX achieves a -17.61% return, which is significantly lower than FSPHX's -5.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FSMEX has outperformed FSPHX with an annualized return of 9.47%, while FSPHX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.41% annualized return.


FSMEX

1D
-1.64%
1M
2.05%
YTD
-17.61%
6M
-18.69%
1Y
-11.90%
3Y*
0.79%
5Y*
-0.96%
10Y*
9.47%

FSPHX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-5.41%
6M
-12.69%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
3.11%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMEX vs. FSPHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMEX
Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio
-17.61%8.13%18.37%0.62%-24.84%24.56%30.18%29.58%15.98%26.66%
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
-5.41%9.36%4.91%4.13%-12.82%11.58%24.57%31.48%7.15%23.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMEX and FSPHX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 1998

0.86

The correlation between FSMEX and FSPHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMEX vs. FSPHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMEX
FSMEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FSMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPHX
FSPHX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FSPHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPHX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPHX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMEX vs. FSPHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) and Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMEXFSPHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.65

0.40

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.82

0.65

-1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.08

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

0.38

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.08

0.85

-1.93

FSMEX vs. FSPHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the FSPHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMEX and FSPHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMEXFSPHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

0.40

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.06

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.44

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.75

-0.10

Drawdowns

FSMEX vs. FSPHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMEX drawdown since its inception was -40.34%, smaller than the maximum FSPHX drawdown of -44.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMEX and FSPHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMEXFSPHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.34%

-44.45%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.28%

-18.32%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.28%

-18.32%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.34%

-29.31%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.34%

-29.31%

-11.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.84%

-14.46%

-8.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-9.83%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

8.20%

+2.61%

Volatility

FSMEX vs. FSPHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) at 5.10%. This indicates that FSMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMEXFSPHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

5.10%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

14.42%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.08%

17.61%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

18.32%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

19.02%

+1.74%

FSMEX vs. FSPHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMEX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPHX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMEX vs. FSPHX - Dividend Comparison

FSMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.03%, more than FSPHX's 12.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMEX
Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio
22.03%10.53%17.04%0.00%1.80%8.12%6.65%1.77%7.47%6.26%5.84%16.35%
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
12.88%4.16%10.77%0.00%2.13%9.06%11.29%1.35%9.02%2.27%0.18%11.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMEX and FSPHX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMEX has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FSPHX (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMEX dropped -40.34% vs FSPHX's -44.45%.

FSPHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMEX and FSPHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer