PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMB vs. BOBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMB vs. BOBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) and CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMB achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than BOBP's 23.96% return.


FSMB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.13%
6M
1.42%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*

BOBP

1D
-0.81%
1M
6.01%
YTD
23.96%
6M
23.09%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMB vs. BOBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FSMB and BOBP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMB vs. BOBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMB
FSMB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FSMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BOBP
BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMB vs. BOBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) and CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMBBOBPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.34

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.61

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.88

11.56

-0.67

FSMB vs. BOBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the BOBP Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMB and BOBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMBBOBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

1.85

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.83

-1.08

Drawdowns

FSMB vs. BOBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMB drawdown since its inception was -6.32%, smaller than the maximum BOBP drawdown of -13.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMB and BOBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMBBOBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-13.06%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-13.06%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.81%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-1.63%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

2.95%

-2.57%

Volatility

FSMB vs. BOBP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) is 0.43%, while CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that FSMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMBBOBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

6.99%

-6.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.02%

16.34%

-15.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40%

18.48%

-17.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.96%

18.26%

-16.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.92%

18.26%

-15.34%

FSMB vs. BOBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BOBP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMB vs. BOBP - Dividend Comparison

FSMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than BOBP's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BOBP
CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF
2.67%3.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSMB
First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF
3.14%3.09%2.88%2.40%1.47%1.20%1.79%2.27%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMB and BOBP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOBP has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to FSMB (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMB dropped -6.32% vs BOBP's -13.06%.

On 1-year performance, BOBP leads with 33.95% vs 4.08% for FSMB. On fees, FSMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FSMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOBP has performed better with a 33.95% return vs 4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BOBP.

FSMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 2.67% for BOBP.

FSMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BOBP is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSMB and 0.70% for BOBP.

FSMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMB and BOBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer