PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMAX vs. SSMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMAX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSMAX having a 14.89% return and SSMHX slightly lower at 14.18%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSMAX having a 12.17% annualized return and SSMHX not far behind at 11.94%.


FSMAX

1D
1.07%
1M
5.80%
YTD
14.89%
6M
13.61%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
12.17%

SSMHX

1D
1.00%
1M
5.71%
YTD
14.18%
6M
13.12%
1Y
29.97%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMAX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
14.89%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
14.18%12.90%10.73%25.21%-25.43%13.08%32.46%28.00%-9.21%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMAX and SSMHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.99

The correlation between FSMAX and SSMHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMAX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SSMHX
SSMHX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SSMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMAX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMAXSSMHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.18

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.05

11.56

-0.51

FSMAX vs. SSMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the SSMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMAX and SSMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMAXSSMHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.89

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.29

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.54

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.48

-0.02

Drawdowns

FSMAX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMAX drawdown since its inception was -50.55%, which is greater than SSMHX's maximum drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMAX and SSMHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMAXSSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.55%

-41.61%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-10.03%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.82%

-30.38%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-34.84%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.55%

-41.61%

-8.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-9.15%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.76%

+0.14%

Volatility

FSMAX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) have volatilities of 4.70% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMAXSSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

4.70%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

12.36%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

16.90%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

22.41%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.24%

22.39%

+7.85%

FSMAX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMAX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSMAX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison

FSMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SSMHX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
6.24%7.12%0.00%1.56%2.31%16.30%2.91%3.65%6.43%4.01%1.71%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FSMAX and SSMHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSMHX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FSMAX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMAX dropped -50.55% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.

SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMAX and SSMHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer