PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLTX vs. QSPRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLTX vs. QSPRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLTX achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than QSPRX's 12.86% return.


FSLTX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.37%
YTD
5.48%
6M
6.43%
1Y
10.06%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
10Y*

QSPRX

1D
1.65%
1M
2.40%
YTD
12.86%
6M
13.52%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
21.50%
5Y*
19.34%
10Y*
7.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLTX vs. QSPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FSLTX
Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund
5.48%7.69%10.10%1.68%
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
12.86%14.94%21.60%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLTX and QSPRX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLTX vs. QSPRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLTX
FSLTX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

QSPRX
QSPRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QSPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLTX vs. QSPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLTXQSPRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.59

2.01

+3.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

9.08

2.99

+6.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.66

1.35

+1.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

3.76

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.30

9.97

+19.33

FSLTX vs. QSPRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLTX Sharpe Ratio is 5.59, which is higher than the QSPRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLTX and QSPRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSLTXQSPRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59

2.01

+3.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

0.58

+1.04

Drawdowns

FSLTX vs. QSPRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLTX drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum QSPRX drawdown of -41.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLTX and QSPRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLTXQSPRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-41.22%

+37.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.00%

-5.06%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.78%

-9.25%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-10.08%

+9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

1.91%

-1.53%

Volatility

FSLTX vs. QSPRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund (FSLTX) is 0.53%, while AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that FSLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLTXQSPRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

3.22%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.55%

7.19%

-5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18%

9.59%

-7.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

15.93%

-11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

12.86%

-7.97%

FSLTX vs. QSPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLTX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is lower than QSPRX's 5.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLTX vs. QSPRX - Dividend Comparison

FSLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than QSPRX's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLTX
Strategic Advisers Alternatives Fund
5.22%5.50%7.52%3.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
2.33%2.63%6.99%23.75%22.67%12.85%0.00%1.62%1.09%7.15%1.74%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLTX and QSPRX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSPRX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to FSLTX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLTX dropped -3.78% vs QSPRX's -41.22%.

FSLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.59 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLTX and QSPRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer