PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSKAX vs. VIIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSKAX vs. VIIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VIIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSKAX having a 11.22% return and VIIIX slightly lower at 10.88%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSKAX having a 15.01% annualized return and VIIIX not far ahead at 15.65%.


FSKAX

1D
-0.77%
1M
4.09%
YTD
11.22%
6M
10.94%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
15.01%

VIIIX

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.88%
6M
10.80%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
14.05%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSKAX vs. VIIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
11.22%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%
VIIIX
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
10.88%17.87%26.29%25.79%-18.14%28.69%18.41%31.48%-4.41%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FSKAX and VIIIX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.99

The correlation between FSKAX and VIIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSKAX vs. VIIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VIIIX
VIIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VIIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VIIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSKAX vs. VIIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VIIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSKAXVIIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.17

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.55

14.79

-0.25

FSKAX vs. VIIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSKAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the VIIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSKAX and VIIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSKAXVIIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.37

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.84

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.87

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.49

+0.35

Drawdowns

FSKAX vs. VIIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSKAX drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, smaller than the maximum VIIIX drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKAX and VIIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSKAXVIIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-55.18%

+20.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-8.90%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-18.75%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-24.50%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

-33.79%

-1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.74%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-10.02%

+6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.90%

+0.04%

Volatility

FSKAX vs. VIIIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VIIIX) at 2.93%. This indicates that FSKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSKAXVIIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.93%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

8.99%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

11.88%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

16.89%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

18.06%

+0.40%

FSKAX vs. VIIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSKAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VIIIX's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSKAX vs. VIIIX - Dividend Comparison

FSKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than VIIIX's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.94%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
VIIIX
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.43%2.11%3.66%2.66%3.39%4.79%3.07%2.86%2.45%1.84%2.38%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FSKAX and VIIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSKAX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to VIIIX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSKAX dropped -35.01% vs VIIIX's -55.18%.

VIIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSKAX and VIIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer