PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSKAX vs. SVPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSKAX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSKAX achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.49% return.


FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%

SVPFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSKAX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%15.19%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
1.49%4.19%3.82%5.30%-4.37%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FSKAX and SVPFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021

0.13

The correlation between FSKAX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (5 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSKAX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SVPFX
SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSKAX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSKAXSVPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.53

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.97

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

13.46

+2.06

FSKAX vs. SVPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSKAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the SVPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSKAX and SVPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSKAXSVPFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.35

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.38

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.39

+0.46

Drawdowns

FSKAX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSKAX drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKAX and SVPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSKAXSVPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-6.37%

-28.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-1.33%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-5.32%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-6.37%

-19.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-1.93%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.43%

+1.51%

Volatility

FSKAX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.67%. This indicates that FSKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSKAXSVPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

0.67%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

1.47%

+7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

2.26%

+10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

5.60%

+11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

5.51%

+12.95%

FSKAX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSKAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSKAX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison

FSKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
2.47%1.83%4.37%4.29%0.76%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSKAX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSKAX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to SVPFX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSKAX dropped -35.01% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSKAX and SVPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer