FSKAX vs. FHQFX
FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) and FHQFX (Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FSKAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FHQFX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSKAX returned 11.94%/yr vs 3.04%/yr for FHQFX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSKAX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FHQFX.
Performance
FSKAX vs. FHQFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSKAX achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly higher than FHQFX's 1.41% return.
FSKAX
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 8.93%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
FHQFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- —
FSKAX vs. FHQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 8.93% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 10.02% |
FHQFX Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund | 1.41% | 4.37% | 5.56% | 4.47% | -0.50% | 0.01% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSKAX and FHQFX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2020 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSKAX vs. FHQFX — Risk / Return Rank
FSKAX
FHQFX
FSKAX vs. FHQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund (FHQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSKAX | FHQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -26.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 20.94 | -19.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 41.79 | -39.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 119.47 | -107.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSKAX vs. FHQFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSKAX drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, which is greater than FHQFX's maximum drawdown of -0.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKAX and FHQFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSKAX | FHQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.01% | -0.70% | -34.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -0.10% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -0.70% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.39% | -0.70% | -24.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.82% | 0.00% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -0.08% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 0.03% | +1.98% |
Volatility
FSKAX vs. FHQFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund (FHQFX) at 0.31%. This indicates that FSKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSKAX | FHQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 0.31% | +4.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 0.74% | +9.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.96% | 1.14% | +11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 1.26% | +16.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 1.18% | +17.29% |
FSKAX vs. FHQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSKAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FHQFX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FSKAX vs. FHQFX - Dividend Comparison
FSKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than FHQFX's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHQFX Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund | 3.89% | 4.16% | 5.09% | 4.67% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 0.96% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSKAX and FHQFX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSKAX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to FHQFX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSKAX dropped -35.01% vs FHQFX's -0.70%.
FHQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSKAX and FHQFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer