FSGS vs. FTXL
FSGS (First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSGS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SMID Growth Strength Index, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSGS returned 2.19%/yr vs 34.63%/yr for FTXL. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
FSGS vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSGS achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
FSGS
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
FSGS vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | 1.27% | 2.41% | 6.38% | 15.98% | -13.17% | 25.56% | 10.26% | 21.31% | -11.92% | 10.39% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 46.08% | 61.77% | -14.47% | 18.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSGS and FTXL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.53 |
The correlation between FSGS and FTXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FSGS vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSGS
FTXL
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
FSGS
FTXL
Financial Services
FSGS
FTXL
-
Technology
FSGS
FTXL
Healthcare
FSGS
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
FSGS
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
FSGS
FTXL
-
Energy
FSGS
FTXL
-
Communication Services
FSGS
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
FSGS
FTXL
-
Real Estate
FSGS
FTXL
-
Utilities
FSGS
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSGS vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
FSGS
FTXL
FSGS vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSGS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.78 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 15.62 | -15.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | 58.28 | -57.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSGS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 6.33 | -6.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.97 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.94 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
FSGS vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSGS drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGS and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSGS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -43.87% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -14.51% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.08% | -41.57% | +17.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.08% | -43.87% | +19.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | 0.00% | -4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -10.56% | +2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 3.88% | +0.09% |
Volatility
FSGS vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) is 3.74%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that FSGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSGS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 14.28% | -10.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 28.98% | -18.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 35.94% | -20.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 36.02% | -15.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 34.25% | -11.44% |
FSGS vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FSGS and FTXL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
FSGS vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
FSGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.71% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 1.35% | 1.32% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSGS and FTXL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to FSGS (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGS dropped -43.26% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 2.19% for FSGS. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FSGS has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSGS and FTXL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for FSGS.
FSGS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. FSGS tracks SMID Growth Strength Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSGS and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer