FSGRX vs. DSCIX
FSGRX (Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund Class A) and DSCIX (Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSGRX returned 12.99%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for DSCIX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSGRX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DSCIX.
Performance
FSGRX vs. DSCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSGRX achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly lower than DSCIX's 26.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FSGRX has outperformed DSCIX with an annualized return of 12.99%, while DSCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.30% annualized return.
FSGRX
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 11.88%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
DSCIX
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 26.61%
- 6M
- 23.49%
- 1Y
- 50.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
FSGRX vs. DSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSGRX Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | 11.88% | 7.64% | 12.77% | 30.65% | -30.44% | 13.26% | 41.35% | 33.04% | -3.29% | 20.97% |
DSCIX Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund | 26.61% | 13.18% | 5.10% | 20.00% | -21.46% | 30.92% | 13.33% | 21.51% | -16.96% | 11.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSGRX and DSCIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FSGRX and DSCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSGRX vs. DSCIX — Risk / Return Rank
FSGRX
DSCIX
FSGRX vs. DSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FSGRX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSGRX | DSCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 7.04 | -4.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 25.36 | -16.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSGRX vs. DSCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSGRX drawdown since its inception was -59.75%, which is greater than DSCIX's maximum drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGRX and DSCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSGRX | DSCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.75% | -47.60% | -12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.04% | -7.08% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -32.94% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.97% | -32.94% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.10% | -47.60% | +7.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.95% | -9.82% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 1.96% | +1.19% |
Volatility
FSGRX vs. DSCIX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FSGRX) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) at 4.83%. This indicates that FSGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSGRX | DSCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 4.83% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 12.33% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.13% | 17.36% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 22.21% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 23.26% | +1.09% |
FSGRX vs. DSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSGRX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than DSCIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSGRX vs. DSCIX - Dividend Comparison
FSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than DSCIX's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSCIX Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund | 4.70% | 6.01% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 4.99% | 8.71% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 9.11% | 0.03% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
FSGRX Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | 7.92% | 8.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 30.36% | 10.34% | 6.68% | 24.73% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSGRX and DSCIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSGRX has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to DSCIX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGRX dropped -59.75% vs DSCIX's -47.60%.
DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSGRX and DSCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer