PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

FSF.TO (CI Global Financial Sector ETF) and XFN.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. FSF.TO is actively managed, while XFN.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSF.TO returned 21.70%/yr vs 15.76%/yr for XFN.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Financial Sector ETF (FSF.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSF.TO achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than XFN.TO's 22.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FSF.TO has outperformed XFN.TO with an annualized return of 21.70%, while XFN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.76% annualized return.

FSF.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.48%
YTD
2.28%
6M
2.00%
1Y
13.30%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
21.70%

XFN.TO

1D
0.74%
1M
9.11%
YTD
22.64%
6M
22.22%
1Y
49.48%
3Y*
32.58%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*
15.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF		2.28%20.68%33.83%10.49%-11.77%30.71%-1.98%25.77%-21.19%23.28%
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF		22.64%34.40%29.32%13.09%-9.92%35.57%0.99%20.66%-9.76%12.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FSF.TO and XFN.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.33

The correlation between FSF.TO and XFN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Global Financial Sector ETF

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF

Often compared with XFN.TO:
XFN.TO vs. VDY.TOXFN.TO vs. CEW.TOXFN.TO vs. FIE.TOXFN.TO vs. XIU.TOXFN.TO vs. VFV.TOXFN.TO vs. RY.TOXFN.TO vs. XUS-U.TO

Return for Risk

FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FSF.TO
FSF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FSF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FSF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
XFN.TO
XFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Financial Sector ETF (FSF.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FSF.TOXFN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.86
4.09

-3.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.30
5.65

-4.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.73

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

6.38

-5.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

25.76

-23.16

FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSF.TO and XFN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSF.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.78%, which is greater than XFN.TO's maximum drawdown of -55.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSF.TO and XFN.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FSF.TOXFN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.78%

-55.53%

-18.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.09%

-7.80%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-12.37%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

-21.90%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.78%

-39.93%

-33.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

0.00%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-6.94%

-9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

1.93%

+3.19%

Volatility

FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Global Financial Sector ETF (FSF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) at 2.73%. This indicates that FSF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FSF.TOXFN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

2.73%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.90%

10.16%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

12.17%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

13.50%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

212.69%

16.49%

+196.20%

Dividends

FSF.TO vs. XFN.TO - Dividend Comparison

FSF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than XFN.TO's 1.99% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF		1.43%1.28%1.41%2.10%2.35%0.74%1.28%1.91%2.30%0.96%0.79%0.00%
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF		1.99%2.39%3.16%3.60%3.48%2.67%3.35%3.00%3.43%2.73%2.83%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

FSF.TO and XFN.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: CI and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSF.TO and XFN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer