PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Financial Sector ETF (FSF.TO) and CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF (JAPN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSF.TO achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than JAPN.TO's 20.60% return.


FSF.TO

1D
1.62%
1M
2.45%
6M
6.56%
YTD
8.03%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
30.36%
ALL TIME*
14.13%

JAPN.TO

1D
-0.52%
1M
-0.53%
6M
12.92%
YTD
20.60%
1Y
47.23%
3Y*
28.88%
5Y*
25.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$661.89CA$2.69KCA$6.54K
CA$71.61KCA$96.18KCA$111.76K

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
8.03%20.68%33.83%10.49%-11.77%30.71%-1.98%25.77%-21.05%
JAPN.TO
CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF
20.60%30.67%29.25%35.51%10.82%16.05%2.20%16.56%-17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FSF.TO and JAPN.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018

0.13

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSF.TO
JAPN.TO

Financial Services

98.7%
19.5%

Industrials

1.0%
25.5%

Technology

0.3%
15.7%

Basic Materials

-

7.6%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

15.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

1.5%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Financial Services

FSF.TO
98.7%
JAPN.TO
19.5%

Industrials

FSF.TO
1.0%
JAPN.TO
25.5%

Technology

FSF.TO
0.3%
JAPN.TO
15.7%

Basic Materials

FSF.TO

-

JAPN.TO
7.6%

Communication Services

FSF.TO

-

JAPN.TO
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FSF.TO

-

JAPN.TO
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

FSF.TO

-

JAPN.TO
4.8%

Energy

FSF.TO

-

JAPN.TO
1.5%

Healthcare

FSF.TO

-

JAPN.TO
6.2%

Real Estate

FSF.TO

-

JAPN.TO

-

Utilities

FSF.TO

-

JAPN.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSF.TO
FSF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FSF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

JAPN.TO
JAPN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JAPN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAPN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Financial Sector ETF (FSF.TO) and CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF (JAPN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSF.TOJAPN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.46

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

4.10

-2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

14.95

-11.68

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the JAPN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSF.TO and JAPN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSF.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.78%, which is greater than JAPN.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSF.TO and JAPN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSF.TOJAPN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.78%

-28.88%

-44.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.09%

-11.09%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-21.67%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

-21.67%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-2.73%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-5.93%

-10.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

3.03%

+2.09%

Volatility

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Global Financial Sector ETF (FSF.TO) and CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF (JAPN.TO) have volatilities of 5.02% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSF.TOJAPN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

5.07%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

14.22%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

18.07%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

19.17%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

211.89%

19.23%

+192.66%

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSF.TO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than JAPN.TO's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSF.TO vs. JAPN.TO - Dividend Comparison

FSF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than JAPN.TO's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FSF.TO
CI Global Financial Sector ETF
1.35%1.28%1.41%2.10%2.35%0.74%1.28%1.91%2.30%0.96%0.79%
JAPN.TO
CI WisdomTree Japan Equity Index ETF
1.55%2.08%1.58%1.51%2.59%1.35%1.36%2.12%0.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSF.TO and JAPN.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JAPN.TO is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JAPN.TO is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FSF.TO.

FSF.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while JAPN.TO is Japan Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FSF.TO and 0.48% for JAPN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSF.TO and JAPN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer