FSENX vs. FJRLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSENX (Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio) and FJRLX (Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FSENX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FJRLX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSENX returned 9.68%/yr vs 2.40%/yr for FJRLX. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. FSENX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FJRLX.

Performance

FSENX vs. FJRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSENX achieves a 35.02% return, which is significantly higher than FJRLX's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FSENX has outperformed FJRLX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while FJRLX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.40% annualized return.

FSENX

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: 35.02%
• 6M: 31.99%
• 1Y: 51.42%
• 3Y*: 19.21%
• 5Y*: 22.08%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

FJRLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: 2.21%
• 10Y*: 2.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSENX vs. FJRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	35.02%	10.56%	4.26%	0.94%	62.98%	55.31%	-32.51%	9.90%	-24.94%	-2.65%
FJRLX Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund	0.71%	6.70%	4.92%	6.26%	-6.22%	-1.46%	5.16%	6.04%	0.71%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FSENX and FJRLX is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013	-0.12

The correlation between FSENX and FJRLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.08 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSENX vs. FJRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSENX

FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FJRLX

FJRLX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FJRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FJRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FJRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FJRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FJRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSENX vs. FJRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSENX	FJRLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	2.15	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	3.75	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.47	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.42	2.84	+2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.96	10.78	+5.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSENX vs. FJRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the FJRLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSENX and FJRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSENX	FJRLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	2.15	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.80	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	1.00	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	1.03	-0.71

Drawdowns

FSENX vs. FJRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSENX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than FJRLX's maximum drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSENX and FJRLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSENX	FJRLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.24%	-9.89%	-66.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.95%	-1.63%	-8.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.85%	-1.63%	-24.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.02%	-9.71%	-18.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.11%	-9.89%	-62.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.09%	-0.26%	-4.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.01%	-1.34%	-15.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	0.43%	+2.94%

Volatility

FSENX vs. FJRLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) at 0.74%. This indicates that FSENX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSENX	FJRLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.60%	0.74%	+6.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.35%	1.62%	+13.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.70%	2.15%	+17.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.26%	2.76%	+24.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.96%	2.41%	+28.55%

FSENX vs. FJRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSENX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FJRLX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSENX vs. FJRLX - Dividend Comparison

FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than FJRLX's 4.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FJRLX Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund	4.08%	3.93%	3.36%	2.38%	1.26%	1.25%	2.38%	2.44%	2.29%	1.79%	1.88%	1.60%
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	1.59%	1.95%	1.95%	1.98%	2.50%	2.25%	3.43%	1.84%	1.48%	1.74%	0.62%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSENX and FJRLX in my portfolio?

FSENX and FJRLX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSENX or FJRLX?

FSENX has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to FJRLX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSENX dropped -76.24% vs FJRLX's -9.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.