PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSENX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSENX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSENX achieves a 35.02% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FSENX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FSENX

1D
1.38%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
35.02%
6M
31.99%
1Y
51.42%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
22.08%
10Y*
9.68%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSENX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
35.02%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FSENX and FCNTX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1981

0.51

The correlation between FSENX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSENX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSENX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSENXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.42

2.13

+3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.96

9.04

+6.92

FSENX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSENX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSENXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

1.72

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.79

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.89

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.78

-0.46

Drawdowns

FSENX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSENX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSENX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSENXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.24%

-49.19%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-11.30%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

-19.75%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-32.59%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.11%

-32.59%

-39.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.09%

-0.53%

-4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.01%

-8.16%

-8.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.65%

+0.72%

Volatility

FSENX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FSENX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSENXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

3.26%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.35%

10.48%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.70%

14.03%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.26%

19.15%

+8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.96%

19.68%

+11.28%

FSENX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSENX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSENX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.59%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSENX and FCNTX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSENX has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSENX dropped -76.24% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSENX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer