PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSENX vs. FADMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSENX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSENX achieves a 37.97% return, which is significantly higher than FADMX's 2.94% return.


FSENX

1D
-0.53%
1M
9.96%
6M
16.62%
YTD
37.97%
1Y
48.18%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
25.53%
10Y*
9.61%
ALL TIME*
8.26%

FADMX

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.25%
6M
2.60%
YTD
2.94%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
7.81%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSENX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
37.97%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-28.28%
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
2.94%9.01%6.02%9.55%-11.84%3.46%6.72%11.06%-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FSENX and FADMX is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018

0.18

The correlation between FSENX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSENX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FADMX
FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSENX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSENXFADMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

2.48

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

9.36

+1.65

FSENX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSENX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSENX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSENX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than FADMX's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSENX and FADMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSENXFADMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.24%

-15.98%

-60.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-2.62%

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

-3.63%

-22.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-15.98%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-0.57%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-3.01%

-13.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

0.69%

+3.75%

Volatility

FSENX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) at 1.19%. This indicates that FSENX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSENXFADMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

1.19%

+4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.80%

3.29%

+12.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

3.80%

+16.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.96%

4.58%

+22.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.81%

4.76%

+26.05%

FSENX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSENX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FADMX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSENX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than FADMX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
4.33%4.33%4.16%4.31%2.91%4.23%3.82%4.34%2.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.55%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSENX and FADMX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSENX has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to FADMX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSENX dropped -76.24% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSENX and FADMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer