PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSELX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSELX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSELX achieves a 86.42% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FSELX has outperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 39.28%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.53% annualized return.


FSELX

1D
0.46%
1M
23.91%
YTD
86.42%
6M
84.56%
1Y
162.37%
3Y*
69.11%
5Y*
46.37%
10Y*
39.28%

FCNTX

1D
0.80%
1M
4.19%
YTD
8.62%
6M
10.40%
1Y
23.87%
3Y*
27.27%
5Y*
15.06%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSELX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
86.42%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
8.62%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FSELX and FCNTX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1985

0.74

The correlation between FSELX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSELX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSELX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSELXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.32

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.73

2.20

+9.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.05

9.33

+35.71

FSELX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSELX Sharpe Ratio is 5.17, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSELX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSELXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.17

1.77

+3.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.79

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

0.89

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.78

-0.23

Drawdowns

FSELX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSELX drawdown since its inception was -82.54%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSELX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSELXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.54%

-49.19%

-33.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.38%

-11.30%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.31%

-19.75%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.37%

-32.59%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-32.59%

-13.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.70%

-8.16%

-20.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

2.65%

+1.09%

Volatility

FSELX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a higher volatility of 11.98% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FSELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSELXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.98%

3.30%

+8.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.42%

10.47%

+14.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.72%

14.02%

+18.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.96%

19.15%

+19.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.06%

19.68%

+15.38%

FSELX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSELX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSELX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FSELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%, more than FCNTX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.30%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
8.79%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSELX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSELX has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to FCNTX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSELX dropped -82.54% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSELX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer