PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCS vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCS vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCS achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -5.91% return.


FSCS

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.73%
6M
2.50%
YTD
5.33%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.87%

NFTY

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.86%
6M
-2.37%
YTD
-5.91%
1Y
-2.47%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
7.50%
ALL TIME*
6.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$142.63K$149.23K$210.39K
$2.39M$1.68M$1.69M

FSCS vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCS
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
5.33%1.77%14.98%16.81%-9.11%26.08%5.71%28.00%-12.85%11.41%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-5.91%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%5.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCS and NFTY is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.36

The correlation between FSCS and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FSCS vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSCS
NFTY

Financial Services

28.7%
22.0%

Industrials

26.7%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.9%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
16.2%

Basic Materials

5.9%
11.9%

Healthcare

5.9%
10.2%

Technology

4.0%
9.7%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.0%

Energy

2.0%
7.9%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Utilities

1.0%
4.0%

Financial Services

FSCS
28.7%
NFTY
22.0%

Industrials

FSCS
26.7%
NFTY
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

FSCS
13.9%
NFTY
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FSCS
8.9%
NFTY
16.2%

Basic Materials

FSCS
5.9%
NFTY
11.9%

Healthcare

FSCS
5.9%
NFTY
10.2%

Technology

FSCS
4.0%
NFTY
9.7%

Communication Services

FSCS
2.0%
NFTY
2.0%

Energy

FSCS
2.0%
NFTY
7.9%

Real Estate

FSCS
1.0%
NFTY

-

Utilities

FSCS
1.0%
NFTY
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCS vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSCS
FSCS Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSCS vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCSNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.99

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

-0.14

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

-0.31

+1.68

FSCS vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCS and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCS vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCS drawdown since its inception was -43.57%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCS and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCSNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.57%

-47.67%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-16.14%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-21.55%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.25%

-21.55%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-13.99%

+11.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-9.65%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

6.98%

-3.24%

Volatility

FSCS vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 3.54%. This indicates that FSCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCSNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

3.54%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

12.71%

-3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

14.82%

-2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

17.42%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

20.64%

+0.44%

FSCS vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCS vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than NFTY's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCS
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
0.98%0.75%1.12%1.47%1.71%1.21%1.33%1.68%1.67%0.67%0.00%0.00%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.88%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCS and NFTY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCS has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to NFTY (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCS dropped -43.57% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 5-year performance, FSCS leads with 6.49% vs 5.91% for NFTY. On fees, FSCS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FSCS has performed better with a 6.49% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSCS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.98% for FSCS.

FSCS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while NFTY is India Equities. FSCS tracks SMID Capital Strength Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FSCS and 0.80% for NFTY.

FSCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCS and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer