FSCCX vs. PRVIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX).
FSCCX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Aug 1, 1994. PRVIX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2015.
Performance
FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCCX Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund | -1.53% | 3.21% | 14.82% | 11.86% | -12.42% | 35.38% | -4.21% | 17.28% | -20.65% | 6.35% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 1.00% | 21.38% | 10.96% | 12.46% | -18.42% | 25.60% | 12.58% | 25.95% | -11.49% | 12.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCCX achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than PRVIX's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCCX has underperformed PRVIX with an annualized return of 6.61%, while PRVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return.
FSCCX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.61%
PRVIX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 15.65%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVIX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSCCX vs. PRVIX — Risk / Return Rank
FSCCX
PRVIX
FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCCX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 1.30 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 2.08 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.93 | -1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 8.07 | -6.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCCX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.30 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.34 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.51 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.50 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCCX and PRVIX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Dividend Comparison
FSCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than PRVIX's 22.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCCX Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund | 1.11% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.02% | 1.24% | 0.52% | 0.54% | 1.16% | 4.21% | 1.03% | 2.63% | 1.80% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 22.88% | 23.11% | 9.96% | 3.40% | 5.54% | 7.15% | 2.12% | 4.72% | 9.61% | 3.79% | 3.88% | 22.61% |
Drawdowns
FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCCX drawdown since its inception was -65.90%, which is greater than PRVIX's maximum drawdown of -40.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCCX and PRVIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCCX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.90% | -40.95% | -24.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.25% | -14.06% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -28.00% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.80% | -40.95% | -12.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.31% | -8.14% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -8.44% | -5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 3.65% | +0.69% |
Volatility
FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) is 4.77%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that FSCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSCCX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 6.11% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 15.98% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.63% | 23.85% | -2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 20.43% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 21.29% | +2.12% |