PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCCX vs. PRVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCCX achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than PRVIX's 19.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCCX has underperformed PRVIX with an annualized return of 7.62%, while PRVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.


FSCCX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
6M
10.05%
YTD
16.95%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
7.62%
ALL TIME*
7.49%

PRVIX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.02%
6M
12.17%
YTD
19.55%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
10.53%
ALL TIME*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCCX
Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund
16.95%3.21%14.82%11.86%-12.42%35.38%-4.21%17.28%-20.65%6.35%
PRVIX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I
19.55%8.44%10.96%12.46%-18.42%25.60%12.58%25.95%-11.49%12.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCCX and PRVIX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2015

0.95

The correlation between FSCCX and PRVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCCX vs. PRVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSCCX
FSCCX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FSCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PRVIX
PRVIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PRVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PRVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCCXPRVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.73

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

14.19

-6.92

FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the PRVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCCX and PRVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCCX drawdown since its inception was -65.90%, which is greater than PRVIX's maximum drawdown of -40.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCCX and PRVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCCXPRVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.90%

-40.95%

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-8.93%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.81%

-24.57%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.81%

-28.00%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.80%

-40.95%

-12.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-2.83%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-8.22%

-5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

2.39%

+0.94%

Volatility

FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX) at 3.27%. This indicates that FSCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCCXPRVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

3.27%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

12.03%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

16.86%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

19.76%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.33%

21.03%

+2.30%

FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVIX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCCX vs. PRVIX - Dividend Comparison

FSCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than PRVIX's 10.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCCX
Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund
0.94%1.09%1.52%1.02%1.24%0.52%0.54%1.16%4.21%1.03%2.63%1.80%
PRVIX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I
10.13%12.11%9.96%3.40%5.54%7.15%2.12%4.72%9.61%3.79%3.88%22.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCCX and PRVIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCCX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to PRVIX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCCX dropped -65.90% vs PRVIX's -40.95%.

PRVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCCX and PRVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer