PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCCX vs. FARCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCCX vs. FARCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund (FARCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCCX achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly higher than FARCX's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCCX has outperformed FARCX with an annualized return of 7.54%, while FARCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.60% annualized return.


FSCCX

1D
0.53%
1M
2.55%
YTD
13.50%
6M
11.87%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
7.54%

FARCX

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
11.64%
6M
10.81%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCCX vs. FARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCCX
Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund
13.50%3.21%14.82%11.86%-12.42%35.38%-4.21%17.28%-20.65%6.35%
FARCX
Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund
11.64%2.56%6.04%11.55%-24.57%41.57%-6.14%25.63%-5.57%5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCCX and FARCX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 1995

0.64

The correlation between FSCCX and FARCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCCX vs. FARCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCCX
FSCCX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FARCX
FARCX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCCX vs. FARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund (FARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCCXFARCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.77

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.42

5.75

+1.67

FSCCX vs. FARCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the FARCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCCX and FARCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCCXFARCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.07

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.21

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.28

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.41

-0.07

Drawdowns

FSCCX vs. FARCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCCX drawdown since its inception was -65.90%, smaller than the maximum FARCX drawdown of -70.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCCX and FARCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCCXFARCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.90%

-70.62%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-7.83%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.81%

-17.59%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.81%

-31.77%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.80%

-41.05%

-12.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-3.20%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-10.45%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.39%

+1.04%

Volatility

FSCCX vs. FARCX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund (FARCX) at 3.64%. This indicates that FSCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FARCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCCXFARCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.64%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

9.29%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

12.98%

+3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

18.34%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.41%

20.16%

+3.25%

FSCCX vs. FARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FARCX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCCX vs. FARCX - Dividend Comparison

FSCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than FARCX's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FARCX
Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund
5.22%5.77%9.34%3.30%20.25%15.12%2.89%11.46%6.19%13.43%10.99%8.24%
FSCCX
Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund
0.96%1.09%1.52%1.02%1.24%0.52%0.54%1.16%4.21%1.03%2.63%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCCX and FARCX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCCX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to FARCX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCCX dropped -65.90% vs FARCX's -70.62%.

FSCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCCX and FARCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer