FSCCX vs. AVALX
FSCCX (Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund) and AVALX (Aegis Value Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSCCX returned 7.62%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for AVALX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSCCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for AVALX.
Performance
FSCCX vs. AVALX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSCCX having a 16.95% return and AVALX slightly higher at 17.05%. Over the past 10 years, FSCCX has underperformed AVALX with an annualized return of 7.62%, while AVALX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.30% annualized return.
FSCCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.49%
AVALX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 1Y
- 51.65%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 22.71%
- 10Y*
- 19.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSCCX vs. AVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCCX Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund | 16.95% | 3.21% | 14.82% | 11.86% | -12.42% | 35.38% | -4.21% | 17.28% | -20.65% | 6.35% |
AVALX Aegis Value Fund Class I | 17.05% | 67.06% | 8.29% | 13.11% | 10.50% | 37.67% | 18.89% | 25.67% | -16.95% | 17.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCCX and AVALX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1998 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSCCX and AVALX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCCX vs. AVALX — Risk / Return Rank
FSCCX
AVALX
FSCCX vs. AVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and Aegis Value Fund Class I (AVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSCCX | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.50 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 5.10 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 15.07 | -7.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSCCX vs. AVALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCCX drawdown since its inception was -65.90%, smaller than the maximum AVALX drawdown of -73.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCCX and AVALX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCCX | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.90% | -73.72% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -10.12% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.81% | -13.59% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -32.00% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.80% | -48.34% | -5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -4.61% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -10.92% | -2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.42% | -0.09% |
Volatility
FSCCX vs. AVALX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) is 3.50%, while Aegis Value Fund Class I (AVALX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that FSCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSCCX | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 4.75% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 13.68% | -2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 17.60% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 22.17% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 22.14% | +1.19% |
FSCCX vs. AVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AVALX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSCCX vs. AVALX - Dividend Comparison
FSCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than AVALX's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVALX Aegis Value Fund Class I | 2.00% | 2.34% | 7.07% | 2.23% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.62% | 2.36% | 6.18% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 0.04% |
FSCCX Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.02% | 1.24% | 0.52% | 0.54% | 1.16% | 4.21% | 1.03% | 2.63% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSCCX and AVALX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVALX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to FSCCX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCCX dropped -65.90% vs AVALX's -73.72%.
AVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSCCX and AVALX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer